PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EJUL vs. BALT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EJUL vs. BALT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EJUL vs. BALT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
1.38%20.20%4.38%3.50%-10.92%-3.56%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
-0.00%6.65%9.98%7.45%2.54%0.82%

Returns By Period


EJUL

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
1.38%
6M
3.61%
1Y
18.83%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*

BALT

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.77%
YTD
-0.00%
6M
2.06%
1Y
6.74%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EJUL vs. BALT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJUL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BALT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EJUL vs. BALT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJUL
EJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
EJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

BALT
BALT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BALT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
BALT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJUL vs. BALT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) and Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EJULBALTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.98

1.51

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.95

2.32

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

1.95

+1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.21

12.95

+3.26

EJUL vs. BALT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the BALT Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJUL and BALT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EJULBALTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.51

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

1.71

-1.48

Correlation

The correlation between EJUL and BALT is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EJUL vs. BALT - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJUL nor BALT has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
EJUL
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.64%
BALT
Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EJUL vs. BALT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJUL drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than BALT's maximum drawdown of -4.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJUL and BALT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EJULBALTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-4.89%

-16.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.34%

-3.48%

-2.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-0.92%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-0.35%

-6.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

0.52%

+0.65%

Volatility

EJUL vs. BALT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) has a higher volatility of 3.42% compared to Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF (BALT) at 0.62%. This indicates that EJUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EJULBALTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

0.62%

+2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

1.84%

+3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.55%

4.48%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

3.36%

+7.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.56%

3.36%

+8.20%