PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJAP.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than ETDD.DE's 7.30% return.


EJAP.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
6.39%
YTD
16.87%
6M
16.66%
1Y
29.75%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*

ETDD.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
4.76%
YTD
7.30%
6M
8.68%
1Y
15.81%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
10.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EJAP.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF
16.87%11.73%14.53%16.88%-12.11%10.01%5.26%22.39%-93.57%9.12%
ETDD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
7.30%22.10%10.81%22.48%-8.67%23.67%-2.97%29.87%-12.20%9.80%

Correlation

The correlation between EJAP.DE and ETDD.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016

0.60

The correlation between EJAP.DE and ETDD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJAP.DE
EJAP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJAP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJAP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EJAP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJAP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

ETDD.DE
ETDD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ETDD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETDD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EJAP.DEETDD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.18

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

1.44

+1.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

4.89

+4.38

EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJAP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is higher than the ETDD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJAP.DE and ETDD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EJAP.DEETDD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

0.99

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

0.40

-0.89

Drawdowns

EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJAP.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than ETDD.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAP.DE and ETDD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EJAP.DEETDD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.44%

-38.45%

-55.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-10.95%

+0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.92%

-16.49%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.42%

-23.26%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.65%

-0.45%

-86.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.83%

-7.18%

-68.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.23%

-0.03%

Volatility

EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) is 3.42%, while BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that EJAP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETDD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EJAP.DEETDD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

5.00%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

12.97%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

15.93%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

17.55%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.09%

18.31%

+15.78%

EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJAP.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ETDD.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EJAP.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJAP.DE nor ETDD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


EJAP.DE and ETDD.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EJAP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EJAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ETDD.DE.

EJAP.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while ETDD.DE is Europe Equities. EJAP.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while ETDD.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EJAP.DE and 0.18% for ETDD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EJAP.DE and ETDD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer