EJAP.DE vs. QTOP
EJAP.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EJAP.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while QTOP is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EJAP.DE returned 29.75% vs 43.30% for QTOP. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EJAP.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QTOP.
Performance
EJAP.DE vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
EJAP.DE is traded in EUR, while QTOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTOP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EJAP.DE achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly lower than QTOP's 24.18% return.
EJAP.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 29.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.25%
- 10Y*
- —
QTOP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 24.18%
- 6M
- 22.24%
- 1Y
- 43.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EJAP.DE vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EJAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 16.87% | 11.73% | 5.56% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 23.21% | 7.69% | 10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between EJAP.DE and QTOP is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EJAP.DE vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank
EJAP.DE
QTOP
EJAP.DE vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EJAP.DE | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.59 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 10.86 | -1.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EJAP.DE | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 2.48 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 1.15 | -1.65 |
Drawdowns
EJAP.DE vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EJAP.DE drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -27.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAP.DE and QTOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EJAP.DE | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -27.66% | -66.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -12.11% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.65% | 0.00% | -86.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -5.64% | -70.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 4.00% | -0.80% |
Volatility
EJAP.DE vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (EJAP.DE) is 3.42%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that EJAP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EJAP.DE | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.42% | 4.43% | -1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.03% | 12.75% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.03% | 17.58% | +1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 24.20% | -7.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 24.20% | +9.89% |
EJAP.DE vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EJAP.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EJAP.DE vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison
EJAP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EJAP.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EJAP.DE and QTOP have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EJAP.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EJAP.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QTOP.
EJAP.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while QTOP is Nasdaq-100. EJAP.DE tracks MSCI Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EJAP.DE and 0.20% for QTOP.
Find the right allocation for EJAP.DE and QTOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer