EJAN vs. VUSV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EJAN (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January) and VUSV (Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EJAN is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while VUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. EJAN is passively managed, while VUSV is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EJAN charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VUSV.

Performance

EJAN vs. VUSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJAN achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than VUSV's 8.03% return.

EJAN

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 6.81%
• 6M: 7.51%
• 1Y: 16.24%
• 3Y*: 8.61%
• 5Y*: 3.11%
• 10Y*: —

VUSV

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 8.03%
• 6M: 10.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJAN vs. VUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	6.81%	1.20%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	8.03%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EJAN and VUSV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.58

Return for Risk

EJAN vs. VUSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJAN

EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 63
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJAN vs. VUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF (VUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EJAN	VUSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.66	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EJAN	VUSV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	2.36	-2.00

Drawdowns

EJAN vs. VUSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJAN drawdown since its inception was -22.23%, which is greater than VUSV's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAN and VUSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	EJAN	VUSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.23%	-7.06%	-15.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	0.00%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.79%	-1.32%	-4.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EJAN	VUSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.10%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.28%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.91%	11.96%	-4.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.11%	11.96%	-0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.69%	11.96%	+0.73%

EJAN vs. VUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EJAN has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than VUSV's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EJAN vs. VUSV - Dividend Comparison

EJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.

Position	TTM	2025
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January	0.00%	0.00%
VUSV Vanguard Wellington U.S. Value Active ETF	0.18%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EJAN and VUSV in my portfolio?

EJAN and VUSV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EJAN or VUSV?

On fees, VUSV is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EJAN or VUSV?

VUSV is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EJAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EJAN or VUSV?

VUSV has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for EJAN.

What is the main difference between EJAN and VUSV?

EJAN is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while VUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for EJAN and 0.30% for VUSV.