EJAN vs. BUFF
EJAN (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EJAN is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while BUFF is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EJAN returned 2.91%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for BUFF. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.89% expense ratio.
Performance
EJAN vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EJAN achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.
EJAN
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- 1Y
- 15.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
EJAN vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January | 6.45% | 14.78% | 2.69% | 5.37% | -8.01% | -1.53% | 10.46% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -13.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between EJAN and BUFF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between EJAN and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
EJAN vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EJAN
BUFF
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
EJAN
BUFF
Financial Services
EJAN
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
EJAN
BUFF
Industrials
EJAN
BUFF
Communication Services
EJAN
BUFF
Basic Materials
EJAN
BUFF
Energy
EJAN
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
EJAN
BUFF
Healthcare
EJAN
BUFF
Utilities
EJAN
BUFF
Real Estate
EJAN
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EJAN vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
EJAN
BUFF
EJAN vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.58 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 4.02 | -1.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | 21.50 | -10.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.80 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 1.04 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.49 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
EJAN vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EJAN drawdown since its inception was -22.23%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAN and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.23% | -46.23% | +24.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -3.58% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.75% | -10.24% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | -10.24% | -11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.27% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | -6.18% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | 0.67% | +0.75% |
Volatility
EJAN vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that EJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EJAN | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 1.02% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.29% | 3.83% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.92% | 5.15% | +2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 8.41% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 17.67% | -4.99% |
EJAN vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EJAN and BUFF have an expense ratio of 0.89%.
Dividends
EJAN vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither EJAN nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
EJAN Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EJAN and BUFF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EJAN has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJAN dropped -22.23% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.71% vs 2.91% for EJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.71% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EJAN and BUFF have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.
EJAN and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
EJAN is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EJAN and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer