PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EJAN vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EJAN vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EJAN achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.


EJAN

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.93%
YTD
6.45%
6M
7.11%
1Y
15.77%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*

BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EJAN vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EJAN
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January
6.45%14.78%2.69%5.37%-8.01%-1.53%10.46%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.42%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-13.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EJAN and BUFF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.58

The correlation between EJAN and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

EJAN vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EJAN
BUFF

Technology

37.0%
36.2%

Financial Services

19.4%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.1%

Industrials

7.5%
8.1%

Communication Services

6.9%
10.9%

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.8%

Energy

4.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
4.9%

Healthcare

2.9%
8.4%

Utilities

2.1%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
1.9%

Technology

EJAN
37.0%
BUFF
36.2%

Financial Services

EJAN
19.4%
BUFF
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EJAN
9.6%
BUFF
10.1%

Industrials

EJAN
7.5%
BUFF
8.1%

Communication Services

EJAN
6.9%
BUFF
10.9%

Basic Materials

EJAN
6.5%
BUFF
1.8%

Energy

EJAN
4.0%
BUFF
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

EJAN
3.0%
BUFF
4.9%

Healthcare

EJAN
2.9%
BUFF
8.4%

Utilities

EJAN
2.1%
BUFF
2.3%

Real Estate

EJAN
1.1%
BUFF
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EJAN vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EJAN
EJAN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
EJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EJAN vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EJANBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.58

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

4.02

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

21.50

-10.35

EJAN vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EJAN and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EJANBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.80

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

1.04

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.49

-0.14

Drawdowns

EJAN vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EJAN drawdown since its inception was -22.23%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EJAN and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EJANBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.23%

-46.23%

+24.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-3.58%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.75%

-10.24%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-10.24%

-11.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.27%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-6.18%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.42%

0.67%

+0.75%

Volatility

EJAN vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January (EJAN) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that EJAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EJANBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

1.02%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

3.83%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.92%

5.15%

+2.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

8.41%

+2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

17.67%

-4.99%

EJAN vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EJAN and BUFF have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Dividends

EJAN vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

Neither EJAN nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
EJAN
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EJAN and BUFF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EJAN has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EJAN dropped -22.23% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.71% vs 2.91% for EJAN. Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.71% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EJAN and BUFF have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

EJAN and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

EJAN is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. EJAN tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EJAN and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer