PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EITGX vs. VTCLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EITGX vs. VTCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EITGX achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than VTCLX's 11.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EITGX having a 15.02% annualized return and VTCLX not far ahead at 15.47%.


EITGX

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.19%
YTD
8.78%
6M
8.42%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
15.02%

VTCLX

1D
0.22%
1M
5.61%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.26%
1Y
28.29%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
15.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EITGX vs. VTCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EITGX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund
8.78%16.79%25.27%28.37%-20.01%24.78%23.13%29.50%-5.19%22.44%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
11.31%17.44%23.76%26.62%-19.07%26.87%21.08%31.47%-4.98%22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between EITGX and VTCLX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2001

0.99

The correlation between EITGX and VTCLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EITGX vs. VTCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EITGX
EITGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EITGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EITGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EITGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EITGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EITGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VTCLX
VTCLX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VTCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EITGX vs. VTCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EITGXVTCLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

3.32

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.53

15.43

-4.90

EITGX vs. VTCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EITGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the VTCLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EITGX and VTCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EITGXVTCLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.43

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.79

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.85

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.53

-0.05

Drawdowns

EITGX vs. VTCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EITGX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, smaller than the maximum VTCLX drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EITGX and VTCLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EITGXVTCLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.96%

-55.18%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-8.79%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.96%

-19.01%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-24.98%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.97%

-34.56%

+1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-7.57%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.89%

+0.43%

Volatility

EITGX vs. VTCLX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) and Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares (VTCLX) have volatilities of 3.00% and 2.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EITGXVTCLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

2.86%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

9.09%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

12.01%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

17.22%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

18.28%

+0.06%

EITGX vs. VTCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EITGX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than VTCLX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EITGX vs. VTCLX - Dividend Comparison

EITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than VTCLX's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EITGX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund
2.16%2.35%1.74%0.67%0.74%0.39%0.69%0.92%1.04%0.97%1.14%1.18%
VTCLX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Capital Appreciation Fund Admiral Shares
0.85%0.93%1.04%1.24%1.47%1.04%1.32%1.52%1.83%1.57%1.76%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, EITGX and VTCLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EITGX has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to VTCLX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EITGX dropped -51.96% vs VTCLX's -55.18%.

VTCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EITGX and VTCLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer