PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EITGX vs. BBLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EITGX vs. BBLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EITGX achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly higher than BBLIX's 1.58% return.


EITGX

1D
-0.24%
1M
4.19%
YTD
8.78%
6M
8.42%
1Y
23.88%
3Y*
21.57%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
15.02%

BBLIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.58%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EITGX vs. BBLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EITGX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund
8.78%16.79%25.27%28.37%-20.01%24.78%23.13%7.49%
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
1.58%12.07%15.83%23.86%-20.59%27.23%12.30%3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between EITGX and BBLIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between EITGX and BBLIX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EITGX vs. BBLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EITGX
EITGX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EITGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EITGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EITGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EITGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EITGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLIX
BBLIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BBLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EITGX vs. BBLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EITGXBBLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.98

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.53

5.72

+4.80

EITGX vs. BBLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EITGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the BBLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EITGX and BBLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EITGXBBLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.38

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.55

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.57

-0.09

Drawdowns

EITGX vs. BBLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EITGX drawdown since its inception was -51.96%, which is greater than BBLIX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EITGX and BBLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EITGXBBLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.96%

-33.49%

-18.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-3.63%

-6.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.96%

-14.68%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.96%

-28.06%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-1.80%

+1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-6.35%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.43%

-0.11%

Volatility

EITGX vs. BBLIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund (EITGX) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that EITGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EITGXBBLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

0.00%

+3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

4.76%

+4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

7.86%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

15.93%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

18.55%

-0.21%

EITGX vs. BBLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EITGX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BBLIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

EITGX vs. BBLIX - Dividend Comparison

EITGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than BBLIX's 9.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
9.39%9.54%4.20%0.28%1.45%3.27%0.34%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EITGX
Eaton Vance Tax Managed Growth 1.2 Fund
2.16%2.35%1.74%0.67%0.74%0.39%0.69%0.92%1.04%0.97%1.14%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


EITGX and BBLIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EITGX has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to BBLIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EITGX dropped -51.96% vs BBLIX's -33.49%.

EITGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EITGX and BBLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer