PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EITEX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EITEX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund (EITEX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EITEX achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 9.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EITEX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 7.62%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.70% annualized return.


EITEX

1D
-0.84%
1M
1.70%
YTD
12.27%
6M
13.28%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
7.62%

COBYX

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.68%
YTD
9.83%
6M
12.54%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
4.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EITEX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EITEX
Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund
12.27%28.58%4.67%10.69%-12.11%4.47%4.51%12.51%-13.20%27.10%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
9.83%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EITEX and COBYX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.58

The correlation between EITEX and COBYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EITEX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EITEX
EITEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
EITEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EITEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EITEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EITEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EITEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EITEX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund (EITEX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EITEXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.22

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.59

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.88

5.05

+6.83

EITEX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EITEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EITEX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EITEXCOBYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.21

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.56

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.35

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.38

+0.15

Drawdowns

EITEX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EITEX drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EITEX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EITEXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.70%

-34.18%

-27.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.88%

-8.95%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-16.29%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.99%

-17.10%

-8.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.10%

-34.18%

-8.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.93%

+1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.93%

-6.80%

-7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.99%

-0.31%

Volatility

EITEX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund (EITEX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.71%. This indicates that EITEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EITEXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

3.71%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

9.51%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

11.81%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

13.99%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

13.64%

+0.11%

EITEX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EITEX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EITEX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

EITEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than COBYX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.07%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%0.00%
EITEX
Parametric Tax-Managed Emerging Markets Fund
4.25%4.77%4.58%5.85%10.39%9.72%1.79%2.63%2.26%1.80%1.67%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


EITEX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EITEX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to COBYX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EITEX dropped -61.70% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

EITEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EITEX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer