EIRL vs. QAT
EIRL (iShares MSCI Ireland ETF) and QAT (iShares MSCI Qatar ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EIRL is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while QAT is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIRL returned 8.09%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for QAT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIRL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QAT.
Performance
EIRL vs. QAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than QAT's -0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRL has outperformed QAT with an annualized return of 8.09%, while QAT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.
EIRL
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 19.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
QAT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 1.83%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.31%
EIRL vs. QAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 3.82% | 28.82% | -1.64% | 35.13% | -18.83% | 13.72% | 9.63% | 28.15% | -21.92% | 29.82% |
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | -0.42% | 8.81% | 5.20% | 2.72% | -7.23% | 14.42% | 6.94% | -0.44% | 20.03% | -11.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIRL and QAT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2014 | 0.27 |
EIRL vs. QAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIRL
QAT
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EIRL
QAT
Industrials
EIRL
QAT
Consumer Defensive
EIRL
QAT
Healthcare
EIRL
QAT
Consumer Cyclical
EIRL
QAT
Energy
EIRL
QAT
Real Estate
EIRL
QAT
Basic Materials
EIRL
QAT
Technology
EIRL
QAT
Communication Services
EIRL
-
QAT
Utilities
EIRL
-
QAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIRL vs. QAT — Risk / Return Rank
EIRL
QAT
EIRL vs. QAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIRL | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.04 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.17 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 0.33 | +4.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIRL | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.14 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.23 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.25 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.07 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
EIRL vs. QAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, roughly equal to the maximum QAT drawdown of -45.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and QAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIRL | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.48% | -45.21% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.28% | -10.60% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -17.41% | -5.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -33.17% | -6.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.48% | -34.04% | -12.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -12.80% | +11.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -19.18% | +10.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 5.54% | -1.19% |
Volatility
EIRL vs. QAT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) at 5.03%. This indicates that EIRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIRL | QAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 5.03% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 10.46% | +4.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 13.36% | +4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 15.00% | +6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 17.56% | +4.20% |
EIRL vs. QAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QAT's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIRL vs. QAT - Dividend Comparison
EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than QAT's 3.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 2.61% | 2.71% | 2.56% | 1.00% | 1.13% | 0.82% | 0.50% | 2.11% | 1.52% | 1.44% | 1.34% | 1.70% |
QAT iShares MSCI Qatar ETF | 3.52% | 3.51% | 5.90% | 3.92% | 4.78% | 2.33% | 2.63% | 3.57% | 4.63% | 4.10% | 3.51% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIRL and QAT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIRL has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to QAT (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs QAT's -45.21%.
On 10-year performance, EIRL leads with 8.09% vs 4.31% for QAT. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QAT has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EIRL has performed better with a 8.09% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for QAT.
QAT has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.61% for EIRL.
EIRL is categorized as Europe Equities, while QAT is Emerging Markets Equities. EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while QAT tracks MSCI All Qatar Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EIRL and 0.59% for QAT.
EIRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIRL and QAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer