EIRL vs. FLGR

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

EIRL (iShares MSCI Ireland ETF) and FLGR (Franklin FTSE Germany ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EIRL tracks the MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index while FLGR tracks the FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EIRL returned 8.81%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for FLGR. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIRL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLGR.

Performance

EIRL vs. FLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 8.53% return, which is significantly higher than FLGR's -0.81% return.

EIRL

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 1.53%
• 6M: 8.67%
• YTD: 8.53%
• 1Y: 21.59%
• 3Y*: 12.09%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: 9.64%

FLGR

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: -0.32%
• 6M: -3.22%
• YTD: -0.81%
• 1Y: -0.60%
• 3Y*: 15.21%
• 5Y*: 6.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIRL vs. FLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF	8.53%	28.82%	-1.64%	35.13%	-18.83%	13.72%	9.63%	28.15%	-21.92%	3.84%
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF	-0.81%	36.67%	10.63%	24.22%	-21.96%	5.40%	12.11%	19.99%	-21.50%	-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between EIRL and FLGR is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.72

The correlation between EIRL and FLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

EIRL vs. FLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EIRL	FLGR
Financial Services	38.6%	20.5%
Consumer Defensive	19.0%	1.4%
Industrials	15.8%	29.9%
Healthcare	10.3%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.5%	8.7%
Energy	4.5%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	1.2%
Basic Materials	0.7%	5.6%
Technology	0.3%	16.1%
Communication Services	-	6.4%
Utilities	-	4.5%

Return for Risk

EIRL vs. FLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIRL

EIRL Risk / Return Rank: 41
EIRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EIRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
EIRL Omega Ratio Rank: 42
EIRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EIRL Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FLGR

FLGR Risk / Return Rank: 9
FLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
FLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 9
FLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIRL vs. FLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIRL	FLGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	-0.03	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	0.08	+1.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.01	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	-0.04	+1.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.01	-0.12	+5.13

EIRL vs. FLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIRL Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the FLGR Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIRL and FLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EIRL vs. FLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, roughly equal to the maximum FLGR drawdown of -46.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and FLGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIRL	FLGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.48%	-46.21%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.28%	-14.44%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.04%	-15.53%	-7.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.14%	-42.69%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.56%	-5.45%	+3.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.05%	-12.28%	+3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	5.17%	-0.85%

Volatility

EIRL vs. FLGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) is 2.90%, while Franklin FTSE Germany ETF (FLGR) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that EIRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIRL	FLGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	4.84%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.08%	15.05%	+0.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.99%	17.63%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.12%	20.35%	+0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.18%	21.39%	-0.21%

EIRL vs. FLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIRL vs. FLGR - Dividend Comparison

EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than FLGR's 3.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF	2.40%	2.71%	2.56%	1.00%	1.13%	0.82%	0.50%	2.11%	1.52%	1.44%	1.34%	1.70%
FLGR Franklin FTSE Germany ETF	3.43%	1.72%	2.40%	2.99%	3.50%	2.67%	2.61%	2.52%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIRL and FLGR in my portfolio?

EIRL and FLGR have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIRL or FLGR?

FLGR has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to EIRL (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs FLGR's -46.21%.

Which ETF is better, EIRL or FLGR?

On 5-year performance, EIRL leads with 8.81% vs 6.78% for FLGR. On fees, FLGR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EIRL or FLGR?

Over the 5-year period, EIRL has performed better with a 8.81% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EIRL or FLGR?

FLGR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EIRL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EIRL or FLGR?

FLGR has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 2.40% for EIRL.

What is the main difference between EIRL and FLGR?

EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while FLGR tracks FTSE Germany RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EIRL and 0.09% for FLGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.