PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIRL vs. EWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIRL vs. EWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than EWL's 7.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIRL having a 9.76% annualized return and EWL not far ahead at 9.89%.


EIRL

1D
0.12%
1M
0.25%
6M
6.83%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
9.76%
ALL TIME*
9.90%

EWL

1D
0.02%
1M
-1.27%
6M
3.27%
YTD
7.22%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
9.89%
ALL TIME*
7.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$628.14K$449.36K$1.15M
$24.47M$30.11M$28.30M

EIRL vs. EWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
10.04%28.82%-1.64%35.13%-18.83%13.72%9.63%28.15%-21.92%29.82%
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
7.22%32.92%-2.80%17.67%-18.89%20.20%11.80%31.58%-9.21%23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between EIRL and EWL is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2010

0.63

The correlation between EIRL and EWL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

EIRL vs. EWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EIRL
EWL

Financial Services

39.6%
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

19.5%
13.5%

Healthcare

10.9%
37.2%

Industrials

10.4%
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
6.3%

Basic Materials

4.3%
7.0%

Energy

4.3%

-

Utilities

4.3%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.9%

Technology

0.2%
1.0%

Communication Services

0.0%
1.2%

Financial Services

EIRL
39.6%
EWL
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

EIRL
19.5%
EWL
13.5%

Healthcare

EIRL
10.9%
EWL
37.2%

Industrials

EIRL
10.4%
EWL
12.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EIRL
8.5%
EWL
6.3%

Basic Materials

EIRL
4.3%
EWL
7.0%

Energy

EIRL
4.3%
EWL

-

Utilities

EIRL
4.3%
EWL
0.4%

Real Estate

EIRL
2.0%
EWL
0.9%

Technology

EIRL
0.2%
EWL
1.0%

Communication Services

EIRL
0.0%
EWL
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIRL vs. EWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIRL
EIRL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EIRL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRL Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EWL
EWL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
EWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWL Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIRL vs. EWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIRLEWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.69

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.05

5.56

+0.49

EIRL vs. EWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIRL Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the EWL Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIRL and EWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIRL vs. EWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, smaller than the maximum EWL drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and EWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIRLEWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.48%

-51.62%

+5.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.28%

-13.48%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.04%

-13.48%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.14%

-28.99%

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.48%

-28.99%

-17.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.27%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-11.04%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

4.08%

+0.18%

Volatility

EIRL vs. EWL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) at 3.91%. This indicates that EIRL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIRLEWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

3.91%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.30%

12.78%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

15.74%

+2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

16.22%

+4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.20%

16.30%

+4.90%

EIRL vs. EWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIRL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIRL vs. EWL - Dividend Comparison

EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than EWL's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIRL
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
2.37%2.71%2.56%1.00%1.13%0.82%0.50%2.11%1.52%1.44%1.34%1.70%
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
1.73%1.71%2.21%2.12%2.04%1.73%1.45%1.85%2.56%2.05%2.75%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIRL and EWL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIRL has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to EWL (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs EWL's -51.62%.

On 10-year performance, EWL leads with 9.89% vs 9.76% for EIRL. On fees, EIRL is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWL has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWL has performed better with a 9.89% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EIRL is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWL.

EIRL has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.73% for EWL.

EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EIRL and 0.50% for EWL.

EWL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIRL and EWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer