EIRL vs. EWG
EIRL (iShares MSCI Ireland ETF) and EWG (iShares MSCI Germany ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EIRL tracks the MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index while EWG tracks the MSCI Germany Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIRL returned 8.09%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for EWG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
EIRL vs. EWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIRL achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly higher than EWG's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRL has outperformed EWG with an annualized return of 8.09%, while EWG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.
EIRL
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 5.57%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 5.87%
- 1Y
- 19.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.09%
EWG
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
EIRL vs. EWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 3.82% | 28.82% | -1.64% | 35.13% | -18.83% | 13.72% | 9.63% | 28.15% | -21.92% | 29.82% |
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 0.64% | 35.79% | 9.79% | 23.35% | -22.27% | 5.84% | 10.09% | 19.15% | -21.40% | 27.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIRL and EWG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2010 | 0.71 |
The correlation between EIRL and EWG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
EIRL vs. EWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EIRL
EWG
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EIRL
EWG
Industrials
EIRL
EWG
Consumer Defensive
EIRL
EWG
Healthcare
EIRL
EWG
Consumer Cyclical
EIRL
EWG
Energy
EIRL
EWG
-
Real Estate
EIRL
EWG
Basic Materials
EIRL
EWG
Technology
EIRL
EWG
Communication Services
EIRL
-
EWG
Utilities
EIRL
-
EWG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIRL vs. EWG — Risk / Return Rank
EIRL
EWG
EIRL vs. EWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) and iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIRL | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.05 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.22 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.41 | 0.66 | +3.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIRL | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.19 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.29 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.36 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.25 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
EIRL vs. EWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIRL drawdown since its inception was -46.48%, smaller than the maximum EWG drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRL and EWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIRL | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.48% | -67.57% | +21.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.28% | -14.54% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.04% | -15.81% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.14% | -43.44% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.48% | -46.80% | +0.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -4.02% | +2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.11% | -19.20% | +10.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.35% | 4.89% | -0.54% |
Volatility
EIRL vs. EWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) is 5.72%, while iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that EIRL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIRL | EWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 6.49% | -0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 14.18% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 17.28% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 20.48% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 21.11% | +0.65% |
EIRL vs. EWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EIRL and EWG have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
EIRL vs. EWG - Dividend Comparison
EIRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than EWG's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRL iShares MSCI Ireland ETF | 2.61% | 2.71% | 2.56% | 1.00% | 1.13% | 0.82% | 0.50% | 2.11% | 1.52% | 1.44% | 1.34% | 1.70% |
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 1.59% | 1.60% | 2.38% | 2.56% | 3.24% | 2.70% | 1.67% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIRL and EWG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWG has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to EIRL (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIRL dropped -46.48% vs EWG's -67.57%.
On 10-year performance, EIRL leads with 8.09% vs 7.59% for EWG. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, EIRL has been the lower-risk option at 5.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EIRL has performed better with a 8.09% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIRL and EWG have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
EIRL has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.59% for EWG.
EIRL tracks MSCI Ireland Investable Market 25/50 Index, while EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index.
EIRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIRL and EWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer