EIRAX vs. EVCGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) and Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund (EVCGX).
EIRAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Sep 29, 2011. EVCGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Oct 27, 1992.
Performance
EIRAX vs. EVCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIRAX vs. EVCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRAX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund | -1.78% | 12.89% | 7.68% | 6.80% | -14.73% | 7.22% | 9.83% | 16.28% | -7.47% | 15.02% |
EVCGX Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund | -8.12% | 26.06% | 9.30% | -17.33% | -22.53% | -9.61% | 25.22% | 23.32% | -9.90% | 49.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIRAX achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly higher than EVCGX's -8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, EIRAX has outperformed EVCGX with an annualized return of 5.51%, while EVCGX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.83% annualized return.
EIRAX
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 6.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.60%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
EVCGX
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -8.12%
- 6M
- -15.37%
- 1Y
- 0.94%
- 3Y*
- 1.03%
- 5Y*
- -7.03%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIRAX vs. EVCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIRAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than EVCGX's 1.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIRAX vs. EVCGX — Risk / Return Rank
EIRAX
EVCGX
EIRAX vs. EVCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) and Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund (EVCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIRAX | EVCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.06 | +1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 0.22 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.03 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 0.06 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 0.16 | +6.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIRAX | EVCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.06 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.28 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.22 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.24 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIRAX and EVCGX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EIRAX vs. EVCGX - Dividend Comparison
EIRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than EVCGX's 1.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIRAX Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund | 2.85% | 2.80% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 1.11% | 5.68% | 3.13% | 7.42% | 2.98% | 2.35% | 0.73% | 1.59% |
EVCGX Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund | 1.73% | 1.58% | 2.15% | 8.47% | 6.09% | 5.43% | 9.85% | 3.19% | 9.89% | 11.34% | 0.94% | 6.33% |
Drawdowns
EIRAX vs. EVCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIRAX drawdown since its inception was -19.85%, smaller than the maximum EVCGX drawdown of -68.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIRAX and EVCGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIRAX | EVCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.85% | -68.37% | +48.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.73% | -17.35% | +9.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.85% | -54.46% | +34.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.85% | -56.84% | +36.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.79% | -35.70% | +29.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.86% | -28.03% | +24.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 6.26% | -4.51% |
Volatility
EIRAX vs. EVCGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein All Asset Strategy Fund (EIRAX) is 4.63%, while Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund (EVCGX) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that EIRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIRAX | EVCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | 6.51% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.91% | 13.50% | -6.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.04% | 20.55% | -10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.69% | 25.57% | -16.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.06% | 22.06% | -13.00% |