EVCGX vs. TRCLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund (EVCGX) and T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX).
EVCGX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Oct 27, 1992. TRCLX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 9, 2019.
Performance
EVCGX vs. TRCLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EVCGX vs. TRCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVCGX Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund | -9.64% | 26.06% | 9.30% | -17.33% | -22.53% | -9.61% | 25.22% | 6.04% |
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund | 8.83% | 36.23% | 10.95% | -15.51% | -26.24% | 6.28% | 59.73% | 6.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVCGX achieves a -9.64% return, which is significantly lower than TRCLX's 8.83% return.
EVCGX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -7.78%
- YTD
- -9.64%
- 6M
- -16.17%
- 1Y
- -0.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.48%
- 5Y*
- -7.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.66%
TRCLX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -9.57%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 39.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EVCGX vs. TRCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVCGX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than TRCLX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EVCGX vs. TRCLX — Risk / Return Rank
EVCGX
TRCLX
EVCGX vs. TRCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund (EVCGX) and T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVCGX | TRCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | 2.02 | -2.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.10 | 2.54 | -2.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.37 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 2.72 | -2.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 11.83 | -12.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVCGX | TRCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 2.02 | -2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | 0.01 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.44 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between EVCGX and TRCLX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EVCGX vs. TRCLX - Dividend Comparison
EVCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than TRCLX's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVCGX Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund | 1.75% | 1.58% | 2.15% | 8.47% | 6.09% | 5.43% | 9.85% | 3.19% | 9.89% | 11.34% | 0.94% | 6.33% |
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund | 1.50% | 1.64% | 1.78% | 2.56% | 2.76% | 8.23% | 1.50% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EVCGX vs. TRCLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVCGX drawdown since its inception was -68.37%, which is greater than TRCLX's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVCGX and TRCLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVCGX | TRCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.37% | -50.67% | -17.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -13.78% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.46% | -49.91% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.76% | -9.89% | -26.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.03% | -23.33% | -4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.18% | 3.17% | +3.01% |
Volatility
EVCGX vs. TRCLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Greater China Growth Fund (EVCGX) is 6.18%, while T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that EVCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EVCGX | TRCLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 6.53% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.52% | 13.03% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 19.55% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.56% | 22.97% | +2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 23.43% | -1.37% |