PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPX vs. USO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EIPX vs. USO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EIPX vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
22.41%11.44%19.11%10.74%0.56%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
83.99%-8.46%13.35%-4.94%-4.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 22.41% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 83.99% return.


EIPX

1D
-0.56%
1M
3.08%
YTD
22.41%
6M
24.64%
1Y
27.37%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
10Y*

USO

1D
-1.99%
1M
55.28%
YTD
83.99%
6M
72.54%
1Y
64.55%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
24.91%
10Y*
5.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EIPX vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EIPX vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPX
EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

USO
USO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
USO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
USO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
USO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
USO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPX vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIPXUSODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

1.65

+0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

2.32

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.44

-1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.25

5.96

+2.28

EIPX vs. USO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the USO Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPX and USO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIPXUSODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.65

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

-0.19

+1.46

Correlation

The correlation between EIPX and USO is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

EIPX vs. USO - Dividend Comparison

EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
2.67%3.23%3.27%3.48%0.34%
USO
United States Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EIPX vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and USO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPXUSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.43%

-98.19%

+82.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.87%

-20.39%

+5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-86.46%

+85.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-75.21%

+72.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

11.77%

-8.38%

Volatility

EIPX vs. USO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is 2.90%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 21.87%. This indicates that EIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EIPXUSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

21.87%

-18.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

29.71%

-21.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

39.38%

-23.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

34.41%

-19.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

38.33%

-23.14%