EIPX vs. USNG

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) and USNG (Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EIPX returned 23.62% vs 44.37% for USNG. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIPX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for USNG.

Performance

EIPX vs. USNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 34.48% return.

EIPX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 18.72%
• 6M: 19.95%
• 1Y: 23.62%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USNG

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 34.48%
• 6M: 36.58%
• 1Y: 44.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPX vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	18.72%	6.96%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	34.48%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPX and USNG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025	0.67

The correlation between EIPX and USNG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

EIPX vs. USNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EIPX	USNG
Energy	68.4%	79.2%
Utilities	26.4%	4.7%
Industrials	4.8%	12.8%
Technology	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	1.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.8%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

EIPX vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 74
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

USNG

USNG Risk / Return Rank: 88
USNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
USNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
USNG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
USNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
USNG Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPX vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIPX	USNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.72	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	3.67	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.45	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.62	6.62	-2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.50	19.91	-5.42

EIPX vs. USNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the USNG Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPX and USNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EIPX vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, which is greater than USNG's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and USNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIPX	USNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.43%	-6.82%	-8.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.17%	-6.82%	+1.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.17%	-1.87%	-3.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-1.52%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.64%	2.26%	-0.62%

Volatility

EIPX vs. USNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is 3.25%, while Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that EIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIPX	USNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	6.08%	-2.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.41%	12.41%	-4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.11%	16.60%	-5.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.02%	16.59%	-1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.02%	16.59%	-1.57%

EIPX vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USNG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIPX vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison

EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than USNG's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.75%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.10%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIPX and USNG in my portfolio?

EIPX and USNG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIPX or USNG?

USNG has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to EIPX (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPX dropped -15.43% vs USNG's -6.82%.

Which ETF is better, EIPX or USNG?

On 1-year performance, USNG leads with 44.37% vs 23.62% for EIPX. On fees, USNG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EIPX has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EIPX or USNG?

Over the 1-year period, USNG has performed better with a 44.37% return vs 23.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EIPX or USNG?

USNG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EIPX or USNG?

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.10% for USNG.

What is the main difference between EIPX and USNG?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EIPX and 0.59% for USNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.