EIPX vs. QCLN
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN).
EIPX and QCLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EIPX is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Nov 1, 2022. QCLN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. It was launched on Feb 8, 2007.
Performance
EIPX vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIPX vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 21.23% | 11.44% | 19.11% | 10.74% | 0.56% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 5.17% | 31.81% | -18.86% | -10.02% | -13.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than QCLN's 5.17% return.
EIPX
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 23.05%
- 1Y
- 25.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 61.08%
- 3Y*
- -2.97%
- 5Y*
- -7.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIPX vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIPX vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
EIPX
QCLN
EIPX vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIPX | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 1.63 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.23 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.27 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.97 | -2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.71 | 12.27 | -4.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIPX | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.63 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 0.15 | +1.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIPX and QCLN is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EIPX vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than QCLN's 0.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 2.69% | 3.23% | 3.27% | 3.48% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.21% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
EIPX vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and QCLN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIPX | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.43% | -76.18% | +60.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.87% | -16.18% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -45.67% | +43.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -43.54% | +41.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 5.24% | -1.85% |
Volatility
EIPX vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is 3.00%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that EIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIPX | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 13.73% | -10.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 27.33% | -19.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 37.76% | -21.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 37.87% | -22.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 34.62% | -19.43% |