EIPX vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) and MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EIPX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

EIPX vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPX achieves a 21.96% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 17.58% return.

EIPX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 21.96%
• 6M: 19.46%
• 1Y: 30.04%
• 3Y*: 21.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPX vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	21.96%	1.03%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.58%	0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPX and MLPI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

EIPX vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPX

EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 86
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPX vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EIPX	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.32	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.31	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EIPX	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	3.49	-2.29

Drawdowns

EIPX vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPX drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPX and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIPX	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.43%	-5.38%	-10.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.58%	-3.84%	+1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-1.27%	-1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EIPX	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	13.05%	-1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.06%	13.05%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.06%	13.05%	+2.01%

EIPX vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIPX vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than MLPI's 6.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF	2.68%	3.23%	3.27%	3.48%	0.34%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIPX and MLPI in my portfolio?

EIPX and MLPI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EIPX or MLPI?

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EIPX or MLPI?

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EIPX or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 2.68% for EIPX.

What is the main difference between EIPX and MLPI?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EIPX and 0.68% for MLPI.