PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPIX vs. SRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIPIX vs. SRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPIX achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly lower than SRV's 36.07% return.


EIPIX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.79%
6M
17.05%
YTD
18.64%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
16.23%
10Y*

SRV

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.41%
6M
32.01%
YTD
36.07%
1Y
40.80%
3Y*
26.23%
5Y*
27.80%
10Y*
12.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPIX vs. SRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIPIX
EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW)
18.64%11.31%26.74%6.25%16.19%21.80%-9.85%23.09%-11.68%-0.68%
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
36.07%5.05%50.70%19.88%20.11%50.45%-41.65%33.99%-21.61%-4.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPIX and SRV is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2016

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between EIPIX and SRV has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIPIX vs. SRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPIX
EIPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EIPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SRV
SRV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPIX vs. SRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) and NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIPIXSRVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.18

3.12

+2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.39

8.84

+5.56

EIPIX vs. SRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the SRV Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPIX and SRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIPIX vs. SRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPIX drawdown since its inception was -43.98%, smaller than the maximum SRV drawdown of -92.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPIX and SRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPIXSRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.98%

-92.97%

+48.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.51%

-13.13%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.00%

-26.26%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.71%

-26.26%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-5.07%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-48.53%

+43.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

4.63%

-3.01%

Volatility

EIPIX vs. SRV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW) (EIPIX) is 3.50%, while NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a volatility of 7.92%. This indicates that EIPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIPIXSRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

7.92%

-4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

16.05%

-8.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.22%

19.93%

-9.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.63%

26.44%

-10.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

38.29%

-19.63%

EIPIX vs. SRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SRV's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIPIX vs. SRV - Dividend Comparison

EIPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.23%, less than SRV's 15.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIPIX
EIP Growth and Income Fund (NEW)
13.23%15.71%7.60%4.09%25.10%3.44%4.02%3.44%3.45%1.77%0.78%0.00%
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
15.18%19.31%12.85%15.56%8.85%4.72%12.05%10.59%12.73%9.07%7.95%11.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIPIX and SRV have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRV has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to EIPIX (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPIX dropped -43.98% vs SRV's -92.97%.

EIPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIPIX and SRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer