PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPCX vs. RYMEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIPCX vs. RYMEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPCX achieves a 22.47% return, which is significantly lower than RYMEX's 40.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EIPCX has outperformed RYMEX with an annualized return of 11.11%, while RYMEX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.41% annualized return.


EIPCX

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
22.47%
6M
24.66%
1Y
41.92%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
11.11%

RYMEX

1D
0.66%
1M
-5.89%
YTD
40.27%
6M
38.90%
1Y
48.61%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
15.03%
10Y*
7.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIPCX vs. RYMEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I
22.47%22.27%9.97%-4.70%17.76%30.13%7.83%9.58%-9.45%7.07%
RYMEX
Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund
40.27%4.70%8.24%-6.14%23.72%39.03%-22.99%15.48%-14.96%4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPCX and RYMEX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2011

0.75

The correlation between EIPCX and RYMEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIPCX vs. RYMEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIPCX
EIPCX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EIPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

RYMEX
RYMEX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
RYMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RYMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIPCX vs. RYMEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIPCXRYMEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.10

2.07

+1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.92

2.66

+1.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.37

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.89

5.12

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.06

13.09

+7.96

EIPCX vs. RYMEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the RYMEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPCX and RYMEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIPCXRYMEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.07

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.66

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.33

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.13

+0.40

Drawdowns

EIPCX vs. RYMEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPCX drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, smaller than the maximum RYMEX drawdown of -91.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPCX and RYMEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPCXRYMEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.05%

-91.81%

+37.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-9.64%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.46%

-14.91%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-30.45%

+12.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.53%

-59.20%

+30.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-65.73%

+61.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-66.07%

+41.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

3.76%

-1.73%

Volatility

EIPCX vs. RYMEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) is 4.23%, while Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund (RYMEX) has a volatility of 8.20%. This indicates that EIPCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIPCXRYMEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

8.20%

-3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

21.39%

-9.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.87%

23.94%

-10.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

22.82%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.27%

22.32%

-9.05%

EIPCX vs. RYMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPCX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than RYMEX's 1.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIPCX vs. RYMEX - Dividend Comparison

EIPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, more than RYMEX's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EIPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I
10.88%13.33%5.65%3.69%14.93%13.83%3.10%1.54%0.87%5.14%6.59%
RYMEX
Rydex Commodities Strategy Fund
1.70%2.38%0.00%4.98%17.15%2.97%109.50%0.74%44.23%1.49%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIPCX and RYMEX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYMEX has higher volatility (8.20%) compared to EIPCX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPCX dropped -54.05% vs RYMEX's -91.81%.

EIPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIPCX and RYMEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer