PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIPCX vs. ECSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIPCX vs. ECSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIPCX achieves a 20.06% return, which is significantly higher than ECSIX's 2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, EIPCX has outperformed ECSIX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while ECSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.86% annualized return.


EIPCX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.57%
6M
11.64%
YTD
20.06%
1Y
37.22%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
3.22%

ECSIX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.43%
6M
0.72%
YTD
2.00%
1Y
6.67%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
3.86%
ALL TIME*
5.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

EIPCX vs. ECSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I
20.06%22.27%9.97%-4.70%17.76%30.13%7.83%9.58%-9.45%7.07%
ECSIX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund
2.00%10.19%5.71%7.31%-3.31%0.69%6.60%5.76%-3.37%4.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EIPCX and ECSIX is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011

0.20

The correlation between EIPCX and ECSIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIPCX vs. ECSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EIPCX
EIPCX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EIPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ECSIX
ECSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ECSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ECSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EIPCX vs. ECSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIPCXECSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.53

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

3.04

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

10.17

-1.03

EIPCX vs. ECSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIPCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the ECSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIPCX and ECSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIPCX vs. ECSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIPCX drawdown since its inception was -54.05%, which is greater than ECSIX's maximum drawdown of -12.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIPCX and ECSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIPCXECSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.05%

-12.95%

-41.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-2.43%

-9.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.19%

-2.56%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.00%

-7.19%

-10.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.53%

-12.53%

-16.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

-0.58%

-5.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.06%

-1.34%

-22.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

0.72%

+3.05%

Volatility

EIPCX vs. ECSIX - Volatility Comparison

Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I (EIPCX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund (ECSIX) at 0.87%. This indicates that EIPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIPCXECSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

0.87%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

2.35%

+8.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

2.87%

+11.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

3.23%

+11.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.28%

3.17%

+10.11%

EIPCX vs. ECSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIPCX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than ECSIX's 1.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIPCX vs. ECSIX - Dividend Comparison

EIPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.10%, more than ECSIX's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ECSIX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Strategic Income Fund
6.39%5.07%6.21%6.18%4.78%3.54%3.47%3.53%3.19%2.96%3.20%3.54%
EIPCX
Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class I
11.10%13.33%5.65%3.69%14.93%13.83%3.10%1.54%0.87%5.14%6.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIPCX and ECSIX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIPCX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to ECSIX (0.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIPCX dropped -54.05% vs ECSIX's -12.95%.

ECSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIPCX and ECSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer