PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EINC vs. YLDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EINC vs. YLDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 28.74% return, which is significantly higher than YLDE's 8.08% return.


EINC

1D
1.55%
1M
1.87%
6M
30.32%
YTD
28.74%
1Y
32.69%
3Y*
28.67%
5Y*
22.43%
10Y*
11.77%

YLDE

1D
0.71%
1M
2.31%
6M
6.30%
YTD
8.08%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EINC vs. YLDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
28.74%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-19.85%-1.43%
YLDE
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF
8.08%13.09%16.44%15.69%-8.56%22.12%10.35%32.46%-5.74%11.35%

Correlation

The correlation between EINC and YLDE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2017

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between EINC and YLDE has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EINC vs. YLDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

YLDE
YLDE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YLDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLDE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
YLDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLDE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EINC vs. YLDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EINCYLDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.31

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

2.13

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

7.78

+2.46

EINC vs. YLDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EINC Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the YLDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EINC and YLDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EINC vs. YLDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than YLDE's maximum drawdown of -33.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and YLDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EINCYLDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.55%

-33.23%

-54.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-7.59%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

-11.42%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-20.22%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-0.26%

-2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.01%

-3.52%

-40.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.07%

+1.13%

Volatility

EINC vs. YLDE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) at 2.82%. This indicates that EINC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YLDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EINCYLDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

2.82%

+3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

6.96%

+5.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.42%

9.34%

+6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

13.50%

+6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.34%

15.70%

+9.64%

EINC vs. YLDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than YLDE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EINC vs. YLDE - Dividend Comparison

EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than YLDE's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
3.44%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
YLDE
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF
6.46%5.68%1.69%1.64%1.68%1.15%1.46%1.65%2.25%1.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EINC and YLDE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EINC has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to YLDE (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs YLDE's -33.23%.

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 22.43% vs 10.25% for YLDE. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, YLDE has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 22.43% return vs 10.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for YLDE.

YLDE has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 3.44% for EINC.

EINC is categorized as Energy Equities, while YLDE is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.60% for YLDE.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EINC and YLDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer