EINC vs. MLPI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and MLPI (NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while MLPI is a MLPs fund actively managed by NEOS. EINC is passively managed, while MLPI is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.

Performance

EINC vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 25.97% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 19.61% return.

EINC

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 25.97%
• 6M: 25.98%
• 1Y: 29.82%
• 3Y*: 30.36%
• 5Y*: 21.18%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

MLPI

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -2.18%
• YTD: 19.61%
• 6M: 18.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EINC vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	25.97%	1.43%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	19.61%	0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between EINC and MLPI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025	0.87

Return for Risk

EINC vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 64
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

MLPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EINC vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EINC	MLPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.63	—	—

Drawdowns

EINC vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and MLPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EINC	MLPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.55%	-5.38%	-82.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.50%	-2.18%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.15%	-1.49%	-42.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EINC	MLPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.10%	13.05%	+2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.54%	13.05%	+6.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.43%	13.05%	+12.38%

EINC vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

EINC vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than MLPI's 7.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.51%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
MLPI NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	7.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EINC and MLPI in my portfolio?

EINC and MLPI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EINC or MLPI?

On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EINC or MLPI?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EINC or MLPI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 7.19%, compared with 3.51% for EINC.

What is the main difference between EINC and MLPI?

EINC is categorized as Energy Equities, while MLPI is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.68% for MLPI.