EINC vs. IEZ
EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) and IEZ (iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - EINC tracks the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index while IEZ tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EINC returned 11.62%/yr vs -0.13%/yr for IEZ. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EINC charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IEZ.
Performance
EINC vs. IEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly lower than IEZ's 47.84% return. Over the past 10 years, EINC has outperformed IEZ with an annualized return of 11.62%, while IEZ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.13% annualized return.
EINC
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 24.40%
- 1Y
- 26.00%
- 3Y*
- 29.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.73%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
IEZ
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- 47.84%
- 6M
- 42.02%
- 1Y
- 85.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- -0.13%
EINC vs. IEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 24.74% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 15.55% | 19.18% | 38.05% | -19.89% | 16.98% | -19.85% | -3.45% |
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 47.84% | 7.51% | -8.15% | 4.43% | 65.73% | 15.98% | -42.98% | 1.82% | -42.47% | -18.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between EINC and IEZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2012 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EINC and IEZ has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EINC vs. IEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EINC
IEZ
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
EINC
IEZ
Industrials
EINC
IEZ
Utilities
EINC
IEZ
Basic Materials
EINC
-
IEZ
-
Communication Services
EINC
-
IEZ
-
Consumer Cyclical
EINC
-
IEZ
-
Consumer Defensive
EINC
-
IEZ
-
Financial Services
EINC
-
IEZ
-
Healthcare
EINC
-
IEZ
-
Real Estate
EINC
-
IEZ
-
Technology
EINC
-
IEZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EINC vs. IEZ — Risk / Return Rank
EINC
IEZ
EINC vs. IEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EINC | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.46 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 8.29 | -4.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.18 | 22.60 | -13.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EINC | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.78 | 3.00 | -1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | 0.38 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | -0.00 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | -0.04 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
EINC vs. IEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, smaller than the maximum IEZ drawdown of -92.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and IEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EINC | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.55% | -92.52% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -10.32% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.01% | -40.25% | +24.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.87% | -40.25% | +20.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.85% | -88.29% | +19.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.44% | -51.21% | +45.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.29% | -48.26% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.78% | -0.93% |
Volatility
EINC vs. IEZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) is 6.39%, while iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that EINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EINC | IEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 7.95% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 20.11% | -8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 28.62% | -13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 36.35% | -16.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.43% | 41.56% | -16.13% |
EINC vs. IEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IEZ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
EINC vs. IEZ - Dividend Comparison
EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than IEZ's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.55% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 1.18% | 1.87% | 1.76% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 1.20% | 2.07% | 2.28% | 1.81% | 3.42% | 0.91% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EINC and IEZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEZ has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to EINC (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs IEZ's -92.52%.
On 10-year performance, EINC leads with 11.62% vs -0.13% for IEZ. On fees, IEZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EINC has performed better with a 11.62% return vs -0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.18% for IEZ.
EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while IEZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.42% for IEZ.
IEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EINC and IEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer