PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EINC vs. IEZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EINC vs. IEZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EINC achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly lower than IEZ's 47.84% return. Over the past 10 years, EINC has outperformed IEZ with an annualized return of 11.62%, while IEZ has yielded a comparatively lower -0.13% annualized return.


EINC

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.60%
YTD
24.74%
6M
24.40%
1Y
26.00%
3Y*
29.18%
5Y*
20.73%
10Y*
11.62%

IEZ

1D
0.03%
1M
-3.54%
YTD
47.84%
6M
42.02%
1Y
85.10%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
-0.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EINC vs. IEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
24.74%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%16.98%-19.85%-3.45%
IEZ
iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF
47.84%7.51%-8.15%4.43%65.73%15.98%-42.98%1.82%-42.47%-18.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EINC and IEZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2012

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between EINC and IEZ has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EINC vs. IEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EINC
IEZ

Energy

99.5%
98.8%

Industrials

2.5%
0.6%

Utilities

0.6%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

EINC
99.5%
IEZ
98.8%

Industrials

EINC
2.5%
IEZ
0.6%

Utilities

EINC
0.6%
IEZ
1.0%

Basic Materials

EINC

-

IEZ

-

Communication Services

EINC

-

IEZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

EINC

-

IEZ

-

Consumer Defensive

EINC

-

IEZ

-

Financial Services

EINC

-

IEZ

-

Healthcare

EINC

-

IEZ

-

Real Estate

EINC

-

IEZ

-

Technology

EINC

-

IEZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EINC vs. IEZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IEZ
IEZ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EINC vs. IEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) and iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EINCIEZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

8.29

-4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.18

22.60

-13.43

EINC vs. IEZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EINC Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the IEZ Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EINC and IEZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EINCIEZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

3.00

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.38

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

-0.00

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

-0.04

+0.07

Drawdowns

EINC vs. IEZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EINC drawdown since its inception was -87.55%, smaller than the maximum IEZ drawdown of -92.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EINC and IEZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EINCIEZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.55%

-92.52%

+4.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-10.32%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

-40.25%

+24.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.87%

-40.25%

+20.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.85%

-88.29%

+19.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.44%

-51.21%

+45.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.29%

-48.26%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

3.78%

-0.93%

Volatility

EINC vs. IEZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) is 6.39%, while iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) has a volatility of 7.95%. This indicates that EINC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EINCIEZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.39%

7.95%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.57%

20.11%

-8.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.72%

28.62%

-13.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.58%

36.35%

-16.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.43%

41.56%

-16.13%

EINC vs. IEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EINC has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IEZ's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

EINC vs. IEZ - Dividend Comparison

EINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than IEZ's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF
3.55%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
IEZ
iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF
1.18%1.87%1.76%0.97%0.65%1.20%2.07%2.28%1.81%3.42%0.91%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


EINC and IEZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEZ has higher volatility (7.95%) compared to EINC (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EINC dropped -87.55% vs IEZ's -92.52%.

On 10-year performance, EINC leads with 11.62% vs -0.13% for IEZ. On fees, IEZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EINC has performed better with a 11.62% return vs -0.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.18% for IEZ.

EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index, while IEZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for EINC and 0.42% for IEZ.

IEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EINC and IEZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer