PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIMAX vs. EIRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIMAX vs. EIRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (EIMAX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EIMAX having a 1.63% return and EIRRX slightly higher at 1.64%. Over the past 10 years, EIMAX has underperformed EIRRX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while EIRRX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.81% annualized return.


EIMAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.63%
6M
2.07%
1Y
7.27%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
1.58%

EIRRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.10%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.55%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
3.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIMAX vs. EIRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIMAX
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund
1.63%3.76%1.37%5.06%-9.61%0.57%4.60%7.01%0.65%4.67%
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
1.64%4.63%5.65%6.33%-3.08%7.84%5.25%5.60%-0.15%1.94%

Correlation

The correlation between EIMAX and EIRRX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIMAX vs. EIRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIMAX
EIMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EIMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
EIMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

EIRRX
EIRRX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EIRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EIRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIMAX vs. EIRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (EIMAX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIMAXEIRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.60

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

4.60

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

19.43

-10.13

EIMAX vs. EIRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the EIRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIMAX and EIRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIMAXEIRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.64

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

1.30

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

1.38

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

1.12

-0.55

Drawdowns

EIMAX vs. EIRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIMAX drawdown since its inception was -29.25%, which is greater than EIRRX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIMAX and EIRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIMAXEIRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.25%

-10.27%

-18.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-0.89%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.83%

-1.67%

-5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.67%

-6.22%

-8.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.67%

-10.27%

-4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.10%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-1.00%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.21%

+0.60%

Volatility

EIMAX vs. EIRRX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund (EIMAX) has a higher volatility of 1.11% compared to Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund (EIRRX) at 0.45%. This indicates that EIMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIMAXEIRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

0.45%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

1.16%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

1.55%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

2.84%

+1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.20%

2.76%

+1.44%

EIMAX vs. EIRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIMAX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EIRRX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIMAX vs. EIRRX - Dividend Comparison

EIMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than EIRRX's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIMAX
Eaton Vance Massachusetts Municipal Income Fund
3.60%4.52%4.15%2.39%2.62%2.01%2.58%3.46%3.27%3.41%3.65%3.70%
EIRRX
Eaton Vance Short Duration Inflation-Protected Income Fund
4.07%3.57%4.08%4.50%5.07%3.54%2.21%2.66%2.91%2.13%2.24%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIMAX and EIRRX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIMAX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to EIRRX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIMAX dropped -29.25% vs EIRRX's -10.27%.

EIRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIMAX and EIRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer