PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EILTX vs. MQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EILTX vs. MQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund (EILTX) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EILTX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than MQY's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, EILTX has outperformed MQY with an annualized return of 2.47%, while MQY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.41% annualized return.


EILTX

1D
0.16%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.46%
1Y
7.36%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
2.47%

MQY

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.13%
YTD
3.28%
6M
2.54%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
-1.93%
10Y*
1.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EILTX vs. MQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EILTX
Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund
1.02%6.86%1.65%6.40%-7.31%1.05%5.63%7.35%0.37%6.12%
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
3.28%4.28%-0.06%10.20%-24.23%2.67%14.65%20.89%-10.12%8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EILTX and MQY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.35

Over the past year, EILTX and MQY have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.35, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EILTX vs. MQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EILTX
EILTX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EILTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EILTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EILTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EILTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EILTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

MQY
MQY Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQY Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
MQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQY Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EILTX vs. MQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund (EILTX) and BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EILTXMQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.20

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.23

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.50

3.90

+2.60

EILTX vs. MQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EILTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the MQY Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EILTX and MQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EILTXMQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

1.09

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.16

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.11

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.35

+0.49

Drawdowns

EILTX vs. MQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EILTX drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum MQY drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EILTX and MQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EILTXMQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-41.67%

+28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-8.13%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.13%

-17.03%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.27%

-35.44%

+22.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.27%

-35.97%

+22.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-14.02%

+12.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-8.29%

+5.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

2.56%

-1.44%

Volatility

EILTX vs. MQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund (EILTX) is 1.07%, while BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund (MQY) has a volatility of 3.57%. This indicates that EILTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EILTXMQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

3.57%

-2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.15%

7.27%

-5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68%

9.22%

-6.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.02%

12.18%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.10%

13.04%

-8.94%

EILTX vs. MQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EILTX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MQY's 2.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EILTX vs. MQY - Dividend Comparison

EILTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than MQY's 6.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EILTX
Parametric TABS 5-to-15 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund
3.20%3.92%3.70%2.17%2.20%1.65%1.80%2.46%2.08%1.94%1.61%2.30%
MQY
BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund
6.12%6.16%6.04%4.46%5.87%4.93%4.21%4.00%5.24%5.67%6.10%6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


EILTX and MQY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQY has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to EILTX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EILTX dropped -13.27% vs MQY's -41.67%.

EILTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EILTX and MQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer