EILGX vs. POGRX
EILGX (Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth) and POGRX (PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, EILGX returned 13.63%/yr vs 18.57%/yr for POGRX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EILGX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for POGRX.
Performance
EILGX vs. POGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EILGX achieves a -13.27% return, which is significantly lower than POGRX's 31.65% return. Over the past 10 years, EILGX has underperformed POGRX with an annualized return of 13.63%, while POGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.57% annualized return.
EILGX
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- -13.27%
- 6M
- -13.62%
- 1Y
- -8.08%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
POGRX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 9.32%
- YTD
- 31.65%
- 6M
- 29.92%
- 1Y
- 68.68%
- 3Y*
- 30.35%
- 5Y*
- 16.55%
- 10Y*
- 18.57%
EILGX vs. POGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | -13.27% | 10.85% | 10.63% | 25.66% | -20.27% | 30.41% | 27.18% | 38.37% | 8.31% | 27.41% |
POGRX PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund | 31.65% | 32.99% | 13.09% | 23.85% | -14.61% | 18.81% | 17.05% | 23.98% | -4.56% | 32.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EILGX and POGRX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2004 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EILGX and POGRX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EILGX vs. POGRX — Risk / Return Rank
EILGX
POGRX
EILGX vs. POGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EILGX | POGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.63 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 4.87 | -5.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 20.53 | -21.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EILGX vs. POGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EILGX drawdown since its inception was -51.01%, roughly equal to the maximum POGRX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EILGX and POGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EILGX | POGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.01% | -51.63% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.18% | -14.40% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | -22.13% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.35% | -26.85% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.85% | -35.29% | +4.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.18% | 0.00% | -15.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -7.12% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 3.41% | +3.42% |
Volatility
EILGX vs. POGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth (EILGX) is 4.76%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund (POGRX) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that EILGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EILGX | POGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 8.78% | -4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | 16.41% | -6.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.56% | 19.53% | -6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.79% | 19.90% | -3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 20.61% | -2.66% |
EILGX vs. POGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EILGX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than POGRX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
EILGX vs. POGRX - Dividend Comparison
EILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.74%, less than POGRX's 18.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EILGX Eaton Vance-Atlanta Capital Focused Growth | 17.74% | 15.39% | 4.34% | 0.57% | 0.32% | 2.18% | 0.62% | 0.17% | 19.72% | 54.05% | 17.75% | 23.15% |
POGRX PrimeCap Odyssey Growth Fund | 18.91% | 24.89% | 20.79% | 13.28% | 12.36% | 13.68% | 12.50% | 5.13% | 2.45% | 1.54% | 5.83% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EILGX and POGRX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POGRX has higher volatility (8.78%) compared to EILGX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EILGX dropped -51.01% vs POGRX's -51.63%.
POGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EILGX and POGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer