EIHMX vs. DNYMX
EIHMX (Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I) and DNYMX (DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, EIHMX returned 2.72%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for DNYMX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIHMX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DNYMX.
Performance
EIHMX vs. DNYMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIHMX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than DNYMX's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, EIHMX has outperformed DNYMX with an annualized return of 2.72%, while DNYMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.34% annualized return.
EIHMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 8.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.72%
DNYMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.21%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.82%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- 1.34%
EIHMX vs. DNYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | 2.23% | 3.93% | 2.56% | 7.23% | -9.70% | 1.73% | 6.06% | 8.74% | 2.04% | 4.95% |
DNYMX DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio | 0.98% | 2.69% | 2.87% | 2.76% | -1.17% | -0.10% | 1.26% | 2.42% | 1.02% | 1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIHMX and DNYMX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.42 |
The correlation between EIHMX and DNYMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIHMX vs. DNYMX — Risk / Return Rank
EIHMX
DNYMX
EIHMX vs. DNYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX) and DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIHMX | DNYMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 4.18 | -2.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.88 | 12.55 | -9.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 56.41 | -46.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIHMX | DNYMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 4.63 | -2.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 1.82 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 1.28 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.33 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
EIHMX vs. DNYMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIHMX drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, which is greater than DNYMX's maximum drawdown of -3.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIHMX and DNYMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIHMX | DNYMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.87% | -3.19% | -36.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -0.24% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.26% | -0.98% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -2.53% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.32% | -3.19% | -12.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | 0.00% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -0.42% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.05% | +0.81% |
Volatility
EIHMX vs. DNYMX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I (EIHMX) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio (DNYMX) at 0.20%. This indicates that EIHMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DNYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIHMX | DNYMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 0.20% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.38% | 0.49% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 0.65% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.68% | 0.88% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 1.05% | +3.37% |
EIHMX vs. DNYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIHMX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than DNYMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIHMX vs. DNYMX - Dividend Comparison
EIHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than DNYMX's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNYMX DFA NY Municipal Bond Portfolio | 2.65% | 2.36% | 2.73% | 1.92% | 0.70% | 0.59% | 1.06% | 1.31% | 1.21% | 1.04% | 1.08% | 0.00% |
EIHMX Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Fund Class I | 3.97% | 4.99% | 4.38% | 3.21% | 3.30% | 2.40% | 2.90% | 3.88% | 3.87% | 3.90% | 4.10% | 4.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIHMX and DNYMX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIHMX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to DNYMX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIHMX dropped -39.87% vs DNYMX's -3.19%.
DNYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIHMX and DNYMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer