EIFVX vs. ETG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EIFVX (Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund) and ETG (Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - EIFVX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Eaton Vance, while ETG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Eaton Vance. Over the past 10 years, EIFVX returned 12.13%/yr vs 12.99%/yr for ETG. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIFVX charges 0.74%/yr vs 2.57%/yr for ETG.

Performance

EIFVX vs. ETG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFVX achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly higher than ETG's 2.94% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFVX has underperformed ETG with an annualized return of 12.13%, while ETG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.99% annualized return.

EIFVX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 6M: 14.31%
• 1Y: 26.63%
• 3Y*: 15.69%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: 12.13%

ETG

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 2.94%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: 22.84%
• 3Y*: 21.34%
• 5Y*: 10.36%
• 10Y*: 12.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFVX vs. ETG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIFVX Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund	13.73%	10.89%	12.44%	8.48%	-3.31%	23.71%	2.23%	37.25%	-6.15%	20.40%
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund	2.94%	36.92%	15.46%	21.97%	-27.62%	33.08%	10.08%	43.62%	-15.90%	33.55%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFVX and ETG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012	0.68

The correlation between EIFVX and ETG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EIFVX vs. ETG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFVX

EIFVX Risk / Return Rank: 59
EIFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
EIFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
EIFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
EIFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
EIFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

ETG

ETG Risk / Return Rank: 23
ETG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ETG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ETG Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ETG Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
ETG Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFVX vs. ETG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EIFVX	ETG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	1.51	+0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	2.14	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.26	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	1.38	+1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.38	5.47	+5.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIFVX vs. ETG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the ETG Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFVX and ETG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EIFVX	ETG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	1.51	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.53	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.61	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.38	+0.34

Drawdowns

EIFVX vs. ETG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFVX drawdown since its inception was -40.64%, smaller than the maximum ETG drawdown of -74.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFVX and ETG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIFVX	ETG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.64%	-74.76%	+34.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.93%	-16.64%	+6.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.87%	-16.95%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.87%	-31.64%	+13.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.64%	-51.53%	+10.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-1.45%	+0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.85%	-13.48%	+9.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	4.19%	-1.78%

Volatility

EIFVX vs. ETG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund (EIFVX) is 3.78%, while Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that EIFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIFVX	ETG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	4.76%	-0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.66%	12.32%	-3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.65%	15.24%	-3.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.70%	19.82%	-4.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.04%	21.25%	-3.21%

EIFVX vs. ETG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFVX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ETG's 2.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIFVX vs. ETG - Dividend Comparison

EIFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than ETG's 6.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIFVX Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund	4.91%	5.58%	6.99%	2.92%	4.13%	9.92%	3.05%	7.05%	17.26%	3.57%	2.86%	4.17%
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund	6.72%	6.72%	8.03%	7.02%	9.94%	6.02%	6.74%	6.83%	9.08%	7.69%	8.74%	7.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIFVX and ETG in my portfolio?

EIFVX and ETG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIFVX or ETG?

ETG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to EIFVX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFVX dropped -40.64% vs ETG's -74.76%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EIFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.