PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIFAX vs. SFHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIFAX vs. SFHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFAX achieves a 0.16% return, which is significantly lower than SFHIX's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFAX has underperformed SFHIX with an annualized return of 5.07%, while SFHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.12% annualized return.


EIFAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.05%
YTD
0.16%
6M
0.64%
1Y
3.16%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
4.81%
10Y*
5.07%

SFHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.51%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.60%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
7.16%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
26.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFAX vs. SFHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
0.16%4.54%8.91%11.86%-2.98%5.41%1.90%9.02%0.28%5.16%
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
1.47%5.70%8.14%11.50%-0.95%3.90%1.77%588.11%0.53%3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFAX and SFHIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.57

The correlation between EIFAX and SFHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIFAX vs. SFHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFAX
EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SFHIX
SFHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SFHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SFHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFAX vs. SFHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EIFAXSFHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.81

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.05

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

7.24

-2.93

EIFAX vs. SFHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the SFHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFAX and SFHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIFAX vs. SFHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFAX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than SFHIX's maximum drawdown of -19.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFAX and SFHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIFAXSFHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-19.94%

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

-2.25%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.43%

-2.25%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.63%

-5.57%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.22%

-19.94%

-4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

0.00%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-0.83%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.63%

+0.13%

Volatility

EIFAX vs. SFHIX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.72% compared to Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund (SFHIX) at 0.46%. This indicates that EIFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIFAXSFHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

0.46%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

1.43%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59%

1.67%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.15%

2.01%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.46%

46.69%

-42.23%

EIFAX vs. SFHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than SFHIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIFAX vs. SFHIX - Dividend Comparison

EIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, which matches SFHIX's 7.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
7.65%8.09%8.91%7.02%5.92%4.03%4.51%5.58%5.10%4.46%5.02%5.29%
SFHIX
Shenkman Capital Floating Rate High Income Fund
7.60%7.61%8.07%8.06%4.99%3.20%3.93%142.83%5.03%4.00%4.22%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIFAX and SFHIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIFAX has higher volatility (0.72%) compared to SFHIX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFAX dropped -40.28% vs SFHIX's -19.94%.

SFHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIFAX and SFHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer