EIFAX vs. RCTIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EIFAX (Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund) and RCTIX (River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - EIFAX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Eaton Vance, while RCTIX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by River Canyon. Over the past 10 years, EIFAX returned 5.09%/yr vs 5.59%/yr for RCTIX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIFAX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RCTIX.

Performance

EIFAX vs. RCTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFAX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than RCTIX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, EIFAX has underperformed RCTIX with an annualized return of 5.09%, while RCTIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.59% annualized return.

EIFAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 3.49%
• 3Y*: 6.86%
• 5Y*: 4.87%
• 10Y*: 5.09%

RCTIX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: 4.44%
• 10Y*: 5.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFAX vs. RCTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund	0.37%	4.54%	8.91%	11.86%	-2.98%	5.41%	1.90%	9.02%	0.28%	5.16%
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund	0.81%	7.75%	7.49%	10.02%	-4.07%	4.26%	6.42%	11.71%	1.82%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFAX and RCTIX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.15

Return for Risk

EIFAX vs. RCTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFAX

EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 37
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

RCTIX

RCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 67
RCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
RCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
RCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
RCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFAX vs. RCTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EIFAX	RCTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.01	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.98	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.40	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	3.87	-2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.61	12.78	-8.17

EIFAX vs. RCTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the RCTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFAX and RCTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EIFAX vs. RCTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFAX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than RCTIX's maximum drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFAX and RCTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIFAX	RCTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.28%	-10.89%	-29.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.29%	-1.20%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.43%	-1.48%	-1.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.63%	-6.17%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.22%	-10.89%	-13.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.30%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.26%	-1.08%	-1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	0.36%	+0.40%

Volatility

EIFAX vs. RCTIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) is 0.70%, while River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund (RCTIX) has a volatility of 0.74%. This indicates that EIFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIFAX	RCTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.70%	0.74%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.98%	1.85%	+0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59%	2.32%	+0.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.15%	2.50%	+0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.46%	3.74%	+0.72%

EIFAX vs. RCTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than RCTIX's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIFAX vs. RCTIX - Dividend Comparison

EIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than RCTIX's 7.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIFAX Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund	7.64%	8.09%	8.91%	7.02%	5.92%	4.03%	4.51%	5.58%	5.10%	4.46%	5.02%	5.29%
RCTIX River Canyon Total Return Bond Fund	7.26%	7.31%	7.89%	8.50%	5.98%	3.02%	5.97%	4.97%	3.30%	4.89%	2.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIFAX and RCTIX in my portfolio?

EIFAX and RCTIX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIFAX or RCTIX?

RCTIX has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to EIFAX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFAX dropped -40.28% vs RCTIX's -10.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RCTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.