PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIFAX vs. FLOTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EIFAX vs. FLOTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIFAX achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly higher than FLOTX's -0.55% return.


EIFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.69%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.71%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
5.05%

FLOTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
0.09%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIFAX vs. FLOTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
0.69%4.54%8.91%11.86%-2.98%5.41%1.90%9.02%-1.02%
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
-0.55%2.47%6.76%8.28%-3.59%2.45%3.95%3.51%1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between EIFAX and FLOTX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIFAX vs. FLOTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIFAX
EIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
EIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
EIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOTX
FLOTX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FLOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIFAX vs. FLOTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) and Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EIFAXFLOTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

2.01

-0.56

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

2.92

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.46

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.42

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.92

3.82

+1.10

EIFAX vs. FLOTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the FLOTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIFAX and FLOTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EIFAXFLOTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

2.01

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.58

1.02

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Drawdowns

EIFAX vs. FLOTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIFAX drawdown since its inception was -40.28%, which is greater than FLOTX's maximum drawdown of -4.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIFAX and FLOTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EIFAXFLOTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.28%

-4.40%

-35.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

-2.36%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.43%

-3.34%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.63%

-4.40%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.97%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-1.03%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

0.87%

-0.11%

Volatility

EIFAX vs. FLOTX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (EIFAX) has a higher volatility of 0.64% compared to Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund (FLOTX) at 0.43%. This indicates that EIFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EIFAXFLOTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

0.43%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.96%

1.34%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57%

1.66%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.14%

2.68%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.46%

2.46%

+2.00%

EIFAX vs. FLOTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIFAX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOTX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

EIFAX vs. FLOTX - Dividend Comparison

EIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than FLOTX's 6.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIFAX
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
7.61%8.09%8.91%7.02%5.92%4.03%4.51%5.58%5.10%4.46%5.02%5.29%
FLOTX
Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Income Fund
6.80%5.79%7.15%7.16%1.56%2.13%2.42%3.78%3.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EIFAX and FLOTX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIFAX has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to FLOTX (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIFAX dropped -40.28% vs FLOTX's -4.40%.

FLOTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIFAX and FLOTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer