EIDO vs. UGA
EIDO (iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EIDO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIDO returned -3.60%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for UGA. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EIDO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
EIDO vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIDO achieves a -33.53% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, EIDO has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of -3.60%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.
EIDO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -5.05%
- YTD
- -33.53%
- 6M
- -32.96%
- 1Y
- -25.70%
- 3Y*
- -15.88%
- 5Y*
- -7.01%
- 10Y*
- -3.60%
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
EIDO vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | -33.53% | 4.90% | -13.02% | 2.56% | -0.16% | -0.60% | -7.13% | 5.30% | -10.88% | 19.40% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIDO and UGA is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010 | 0.19 |
The correlation between EIDO and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIDO vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
EIDO
UGA
EIDO vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIDO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.30 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 3.17 | -3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.77 | 9.39 | -11.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIDO vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIDO drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIDO and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIDO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -86.59% | +23.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.81% | -18.96% | -24.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.77% | -26.68% | -25.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.77% | -38.11% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.41% | -75.89% | +16.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.63% | -18.05% | -36.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -36.69% | +11.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 6.43% | +8.08% |
Volatility
EIDO vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) has a higher volatility of 14.34% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that EIDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIDO | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.34% | 9.24% | +5.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.25% | 30.57% | -8.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.45% | 35.22% | -9.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 34.45% | -13.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.98% | 37.22% | -12.24% |
EIDO vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIDO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIDO vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
EIDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | 3.35% | 3.56% | 5.20% | 2.94% | 2.53% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 1.78% | 1.99% | 1.26% | 1.16% | 1.67% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIDO and UGA have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIDO has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIDO dropped -63.21% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.31% vs -3.60% for EIDO. On fees, EIDO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.31% return vs -3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EIDO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
EIDO has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
EIDO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIDO and 0.75% for UGA.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIDO and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer