EIDO vs. RBIL
EIDO (iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EIDO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EIDO returned -31.45% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. EIDO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
EIDO vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIDO achieves a -34.87% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.
EIDO
- 1D
- -4.99%
- 1M
- -17.26%
- YTD
- -34.87%
- 6M
- -34.69%
- 1Y
- -31.45%
- 3Y*
- -16.90%
- 5Y*
- -8.84%
- 10Y*
- -3.97%
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIDO vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | -34.87% | 13.04% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.70% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIDO and RBIL is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIDO vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
EIDO
RBIL
EIDO vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIDO | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 2.39 | -1.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 17.00 | -17.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.63 | 70.66 | -73.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIDO | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.41 | 5.01 | -6.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 4.28 | -4.34 |
Drawdowns
EIDO vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIDO drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIDO and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIDO | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -0.50% | -62.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.63% | -0.27% | -36.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.54% | 0.00% | -55.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.63% | -0.06% | -24.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.98% | 0.07% | +11.91% |
Volatility
EIDO vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that EIDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIDO | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 0.30% | +7.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.22% | 0.79% | +17.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.35% | 0.92% | +21.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 1.05% | +18.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 1.05% | +23.72% |
EIDO vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIDO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
EIDO vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
EIDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than RBIL's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIDO iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF | 5.46% | 3.56% | 5.20% | 2.94% | 2.53% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 1.78% | 1.99% | 1.26% | 1.16% | 1.67% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIDO and RBIL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIDO has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIDO dropped -63.21% vs RBIL's -0.50%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.57% vs -31.45% for EIDO. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.57% return vs -31.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIDO.
EIDO has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.
EIDO is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIDO and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIDO and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer