PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EIDO vs. EWA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EIDO vs. EWA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EIDO (iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF) and EWA (iShares MSCI-Australia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - EIDO tracks the MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index while EWA tracks the MSCI Australia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EIDO returned -3.71%/yr vs 8.75%/yr for EWA. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIDO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWA.

Performance

EIDO vs. EWA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIDO achieves a -34.01% return, which is significantly lower than EWA's 11.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EIDO has underperformed EWA with an annualized return of -3.71%, while EWA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.75% annualized return.

EIDO

1D
1.82%
1M
-13.71%
YTD
-34.01%
6M
-33.58%
1Y
-32.31%
3Y*
-16.75%
5Y*
-8.51%
10Y*
-3.71%

EWA

1D
0.90%
1M
0.34%
YTD
11.57%
6M
12.06%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIDO vs. EWA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF		-34.01%4.90%-13.02%2.56%-0.16%-0.60%-7.13%5.30%-10.88%19.40%
EWA
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF		11.57%13.35%1.60%13.81%-5.92%8.93%8.29%22.45%-12.04%19.88%

Correlation

The correlation between EIDO and EWA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2010

0.53

The correlation between EIDO and EWA shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EIDO vs. EWA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EIDO
EWA

Financial Services

37.8%
43.6%

Basic Materials

18.5%
23.0%

Energy

10.6%
4.5%

Communication Services

8.7%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
3.6%

Industrials

6.1%
4.5%

Technology

2.7%
1.1%

Utilities

2.4%
1.7%

Healthcare

2.4%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.8%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.6%
6.1%

Financial Services

EIDO
37.8%
EWA
43.6%

Basic Materials

EIDO
18.5%
EWA
23.0%

Energy

EIDO
10.6%
EWA
4.5%

Communication Services

EIDO
8.7%
EWA
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

EIDO
7.5%
EWA
3.6%

Industrials

EIDO
6.1%
EWA
4.5%

Technology

EIDO
2.7%
EWA
1.1%

Utilities

EIDO
2.4%
EWA
1.7%

Healthcare

EIDO
2.4%
EWA
4.9%

Real Estate

EIDO
1.8%
EWA
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EIDO
1.6%
EWA
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF

iShares MSCI-Australia ETF

Often compared with EIDO:
EIDO vs. IDXEIDO vs. EWYEIDO vs. INDAEIDO vs. ASEAEIDO vs. EWMEIDO vs. EWSEIDO vs. EWW
Often compared with EWA:
EWA vs. EWCEWA vs. FLAUEWA vs. EWJEWA vs. EWOEWA vs. ^N225EWA vs. VOOEWA vs. SPY

Return for Risk

EIDO vs. EWA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EIDO
EIDO Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EIDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIDO Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EIDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIDO Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
EWA
EWA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
EWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIDO vs. EWA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) and iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EIDOEWADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-1.29
0.77

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-1.84
1.15

-2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.14

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

1.33

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.38

3.68

-6.06

EIDO vs. EWA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIDO Sharpe Ratio is -1.29, which is lower than the EWA Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIDO and EWA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIDO vs. EWA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIDO drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum EWA drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIDO and EWA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EIDOEWADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-66.98%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.81%

-10.01%

-33.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.77%

-21.91%

-29.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.77%

-24.87%

-26.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.41%

-45.54%

-13.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.96%

-3.44%

-51.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.68%

-11.32%

-13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.63%

3.62%

+10.01%

Volatility

EIDO vs. EWA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) has a higher volatility of 13.82% compared to iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) at 5.80%. This indicates that EIDO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EIDOEWADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.82%

5.80%

+8.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.56%

14.62%

+6.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.14%

17.40%

+7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

19.80%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.00%

22.62%

+2.38%

EIDO vs. EWA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIDO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EWA's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIDO vs. EWA - Dividend Comparison

EIDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.39%, more than EWA's 2.88% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF		5.39%3.56%5.20%2.94%2.53%1.33%1.51%1.78%1.99%1.26%1.16%1.67%
EWA
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF		2.88%3.21%3.71%3.72%5.28%5.08%2.02%3.97%6.11%4.44%4.03%5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

EIDO and EWA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIDO has higher volatility (13.82%) compared to EWA (5.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIDO dropped -63.21% vs EWA's -66.98%.

On 10-year performance, EWA leads with 8.75% vs -3.71% for EIDO. On fees, EWA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWA has been the lower-risk option at 5.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWA has performed better with a 8.75% return vs -3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EIDO.

EIDO has the higher dividend yield at 5.39%, compared with 2.88% for EWA.

EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index, while EWA tracks MSCI Australia Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EIDO and 0.50% for EWA.

EWA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIDO and EWA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer