EICA vs. MLPA
EICA (Eagle Point Income Company Inc.) is a stock, while MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 3 years, EICA returned 7.62%/yr vs 17.62%/yr for MLPA. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EICA vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EICA achieves a 4.41% return, which is significantly lower than MLPA's 21.44% return.
EICA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 4.41%
- 1Y
- 6.74%
- 3Y*
- 7.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.24%
MLPA
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- YTD
- 21.44%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $56.13K | $72.48K | $68.45K | |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | $13.39M | $11.22M | $11.17M |
EICA vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EICA Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | 4.41% | 9.12% | 8.10% | 2.75% | -2.04% | 2.99% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 21.44% | 5.73% | 20.35% | 15.93% | 27.03% | -7.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EICA and MLPA is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between EICA and MLPA shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EICA vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank
EICA
MLPA
EICA vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EICA) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EICA | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.67 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 7.17 | -2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EICA vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EICA drawdown since its inception was -13.45%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICA and MLPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EICA | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -78.75% | +65.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.63% | -7.73% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.63% | -14.20% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -0.32% | -1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.06% | -20.08% | +18.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 2.87% | -1.26% |
Volatility
EICA vs. MLPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EICA) is 0.60%, while Global X MLP ETF (MLPA) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that EICA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EICA | MLPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | 4.13% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.98% | 9.71% | -3.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.39% | 12.37% | -5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.14% | 17.72% | -8.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.14% | 27.39% | -18.25% |
Dividends
EICA vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison
EICA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, less than MLPA's 6.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EICA Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | 5.01% | 5.08% | 5.27% | 5.40% | 5.26% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPA Global X MLP ETF | 6.95% | 7.82% | 7.25% | 7.49% | 7.30% | 8.72% | 13.84% | 9.09% | 10.00% | 8.05% | 7.15% | 9.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EICA and MLPA have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPA has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to EICA (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EICA dropped -13.45% vs MLPA's -78.75%.
MLPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EICA and MLPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer