PortfoliosLab logo
EICA vs. FSCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EICA and FSCO is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EICA vs. FSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EICA) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EICA:

1.85

FSCO:

1.23

Sortino Ratio

EICA:

3.05

FSCO:

1.67

Omega Ratio

EICA:

1.40

FSCO:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

EICA:

6.34

FSCO:

1.57

Martin Ratio

EICA:

21.94

FSCO:

8.41

Ulcer Index

EICA:

0.47%

FSCO:

3.35%

Daily Std Dev

EICA:

5.40%

FSCO:

23.11%

Max Drawdown

EICA:

-13.45%

FSCO:

-25.11%

Current Drawdown

EICA:

-0.69%

FSCO:

0.00%

Fundamentals

EPS

EICA:

$0.80

FSCO:

$0.95

PE Ratio

EICA:

30.31

FSCO:

7.55

PS Ratio

EICA:

0.00

FSCO:

6.96

PB Ratio

EICA:

0.00

FSCO:

1.00

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EICA achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than FSCO's 10.90% return.


EICA

YTD

4.51%

1M

1.17%

6M

3.66%

1Y

9.87%

3Y*

6.12%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

FSCO

YTD

10.90%

1M

4.69%

6M

12.22%

1Y

28.15%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Eagle Point Income Company Inc.

FS Credit Opportunities Corp.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EICA vs. FSCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EICA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EICA is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EICA is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EICA is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EICA is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EICA is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EICA is 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FSCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSCO is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSCO is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSCO is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSCO is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSCO is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSCO is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EICA vs. FSCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EICA) and FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EICA Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the FSCO Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EICA and FSCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EICA vs. FSCO - Dividend Comparison

EICA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, less than FSCO's 10.28% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
EICA
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
5.15%5.27%5.40%5.26%0.92%
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities Corp.
10.28%10.47%11.26%1.95%0.00%

Drawdowns

EICA vs. FSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EICA drawdown since its inception was -13.45%, smaller than the maximum FSCO drawdown of -25.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EICA and FSCO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EICA vs. FSCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EICA) is 2.23%, while FS Credit Opportunities Corp. (FSCO) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that EICA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EICA vs. FSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eagle Point Income Company Inc. and FS Credit Opportunities Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00M4.00M6.00M8.00M10.00M12.00M14.00M16.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
15.23M
(EICA) Total Revenue
(FSCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items