PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EIC vs. ARDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EIC vs. ARDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIC achieves a -2.60% return, which is significantly lower than ARDC's -1.07% return.


EIC

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
-2.60%
6M
1.58%
1Y
-10.02%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*

ARDC

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-0.45%
1Y
-2.63%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
8.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIC vs. ARDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EIC
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
-2.60%-15.28%24.02%20.86%-10.48%28.01%-14.41%-2.31%
ARDC
Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.
-1.07%-3.10%21.05%32.35%-22.21%23.12%2.56%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EIC and ARDC is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EIC:

$237.85M

ARDC:

$301.73M

EPS

EIC:

-$0.05

ARDC:

$2.52

PS Ratio

EIC:

4.72

ARDC:

3.43

PB Ratio

EIC:

0.76

ARDC:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

EIC:

$52.89M

ARDC:

$87.73M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EIC:

$50.57M

ARDC:

$56.87M

EBITDA (TTM)

EIC:

$2.06M

ARDC:

$82.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EIC vs. ARDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIC
EIC Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIC Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ARDC
ARDC Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ARDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARDC Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ARDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARDC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIC vs. ARDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EICARDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.96

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

-0.17

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

-0.35

-0.30

EIC vs. ARDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIC Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the ARDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIC and ARDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EIC vs. ARDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIC drawdown since its inception was -67.08%, which is greater than ARDC's maximum drawdown of -45.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIC and ARDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EICARDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.08%

-45.40%

-21.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.67%

-15.57%

-13.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.06%

-19.78%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.06%

-26.48%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.93%

-8.60%

-14.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.30%

-6.64%

-5.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.54%

7.51%

+8.03%

Volatility

EIC vs. ARDC - Volatility Comparison

Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc. (ARDC) at 2.42%. This indicates that EIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EICARDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

2.42%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.89%

7.13%

+6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68%

9.47%

+10.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.20%

13.78%

+6.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.40%

16.86%

+20.54%

Dividends

EIC vs. ARDC - Dividend Comparison

EIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.86%, more than ARDC's 10.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARDC
Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.
10.72%10.19%9.33%9.85%10.31%7.16%8.40%8.40%9.35%7.58%8.45%10.51%
EIC
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
16.86%17.35%15.44%13.59%11.03%7.78%10.39%3.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EIC vs. ARDC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eagle Point Income Company Inc. and Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
6.79M
24.48M
(EIC) Total Revenue
(ARDC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EIC and ARDC have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIC has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to ARDC (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIC dropped -67.08% vs ARDC's -45.40%.

ARDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EIC and ARDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer