EIAMX vs. MDHVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EIAMX (Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund) and MDHVX (MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, EIAMX returned 4.86%/yr vs 4.63%/yr for MDHVX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EIAMX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for MDHVX.

Performance

EIAMX vs. MDHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EIAMX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than MDHVX's 1.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EIAMX having a 4.86% annualized return and MDHVX not far behind at 4.63%.

EIAMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: 7.54%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: 4.86%

MDHVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 1.53%
• 1Y: 5.11%
• 3Y*: 6.53%
• 5Y*: 4.31%
• 10Y*: 4.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EIAMX vs. MDHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund	1.46%	6.31%	8.22%	9.93%	-6.18%	4.57%	1.89%	11.67%	-2.45%	11.61%
MDHVX MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund	1.75%	5.38%	6.51%	9.86%	-2.81%	4.38%	2.92%	9.00%	-0.13%	4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EIAMX and MDHVX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2012	0.54

The correlation between EIAMX and MDHVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EIAMX vs. MDHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EIAMX

EIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 84
EIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
EIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
EIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
EIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

MDHVX

MDHVX Risk / Return Rank: 93
MDHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
MDHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MDHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MDHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
MDHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EIAMX vs. MDHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) and MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EIAMX	MDHVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.95	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.22	4.42	+0.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.78	1.78	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	5.01	-1.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.14	24.92	-7.78
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EIAMX vs. MDHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EIAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the MDHVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EIAMX and MDHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EIAMX	MDHVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.95	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.31	1.68	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	1.36	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	1.37	-1.14

Drawdowns

EIAMX vs. MDHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EIAMX drawdown since its inception was -43.35%, which is greater than MDHVX's maximum drawdown of -18.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIAMX and MDHVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EIAMX	MDHVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.35%	-18.04%	-25.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.52%	-1.06%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.95%	-2.65%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.02%	-6.26%	-3.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.35%	-18.04%	-25.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.87%	0.00%	-8.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.13%	-0.78%	-15.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.32%	0.21%	+0.11%

Volatility

EIAMX vs. MDHVX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund (MDHVX) at 0.48%. This indicates that EIAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EIAMX	MDHVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	0.48%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.78%	1.42%	+0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42%	1.79%	+0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.20%	2.58%	+0.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.48%	3.43%	+19.05%

EIAMX vs. MDHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EIAMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than MDHVX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

EIAMX vs. MDHVX - Dividend Comparison

EIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than MDHVX's 5.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund	6.88%	7.04%	7.35%	5.52%	5.46%	4.10%	4.46%	4.94%	2.41%	2.88%	3.15%	3.77%
MDHVX MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund	5.33%	5.47%	6.01%	5.53%	4.31%	3.80%	4.44%	4.37%	4.33%	4.03%	4.95%	4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EIAMX and MDHVX in my portfolio?

EIAMX and MDHVX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EIAMX or MDHVX?

EIAMX has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to MDHVX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIAMX dropped -43.35% vs MDHVX's -18.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MDHVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.