EIAMX vs. ETG
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG).
EIAMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Oct 31, 2011. ETG is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jan 30, 2004.
Performance
EIAMX vs. ETG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIAMX vs. ETG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | -0.88% | 6.31% | 8.22% | 9.93% | -6.18% | 4.57% | 1.89% | 11.67% | -2.45% | 11.61% |
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund | -8.73% | 36.92% | 15.46% | 21.97% | -27.62% | 33.08% | 10.08% | 43.62% | -15.90% | 33.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIAMX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly higher than ETG's -8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, EIAMX has underperformed ETG with an annualized return of 4.80%, while ETG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.99% annualized return.
EIAMX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.80%
ETG
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- -8.73%
- 6M
- 0.80%
- 1Y
- 22.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIAMX vs. ETG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIAMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than ETG's 2.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIAMX vs. ETG — Risk / Return Rank
EIAMX
ETG
EIAMX vs. ETG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) and Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIAMX | ETG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.13 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 1.73 | +1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.24 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 1.35 | +1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.20 | 5.79 | +5.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIAMX | ETG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.13 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 0.51 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.57 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.36 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIAMX and ETG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EIAMX vs. ETG - Dividend Comparison
EIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than ETG's 7.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | 6.51% | 7.04% | 7.35% | 5.52% | 5.46% | 4.10% | 4.46% | 4.94% | 2.41% | 2.88% | 3.15% | 3.77% |
ETG Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund | 7.49% | 6.72% | 8.03% | 7.02% | 9.94% | 6.02% | 6.74% | 6.83% | 9.08% | 7.69% | 8.74% | 7.93% |
Drawdowns
EIAMX vs. ETG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIAMX drawdown since its inception was -43.35%, smaller than the maximum ETG drawdown of -74.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIAMX and ETG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIAMX | ETG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.35% | -74.76% | +31.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.14% | -16.64% | +14.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.02% | -31.64% | +21.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -51.53% | +8.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.97% | -11.20% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -13.55% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 3.88% | -3.40% |
Volatility
EIAMX vs. ETG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) is 0.73%, while Eaton Vance Tax Advantaged Global Dividend Income Closed Fund (ETG) has a volatility of 7.67%. This indicates that EIAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIAMX | ETG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 7.67% | -6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | 11.90% | -10.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74% | 20.21% | -17.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 19.73% | -16.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 21.17% | +1.31% |