EIAMX vs. EAPCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX).
EIAMX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Oct 31, 2011. EAPCX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on May 25, 2011.
Performance
EIAMX vs. EAPCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EIAMX vs. EAPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | -0.88% | 6.31% | 8.22% | 9.93% | -6.18% | 4.57% | 1.89% | 11.67% | -2.45% | 11.61% |
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 17.25% | 22.06% | 9.63% | -4.87% | 17.26% | 29.92% | 7.77% | 9.19% | -9.60% | 6.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIAMX achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than EAPCX's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, EIAMX has underperformed EAPCX with an annualized return of 4.80%, while EAPCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.17% annualized return.
EIAMX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.66%
- 5Y*
- 3.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.80%
EAPCX
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 16.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EIAMX vs. EAPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EIAMX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPCX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EIAMX vs. EAPCX — Risk / Return Rank
EIAMX
EAPCX
EIAMX vs. EAPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) and Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EIAMX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 2.25 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.96 | 2.83 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.41 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 3.70 | -1.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.20 | 12.97 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EIAMX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 2.25 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.25 | 1.11 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.84 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.29 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between EIAMX and EAPCX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EIAMX vs. EAPCX - Dividend Comparison
EIAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than EAPCX's 11.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIAMX Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund | 6.51% | 7.04% | 7.35% | 5.52% | 5.46% | 4.10% | 4.46% | 4.94% | 2.41% | 2.88% | 3.15% | 3.77% |
EAPCX Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A | 11.28% | 13.23% | 5.46% | 3.43% | 14.80% | 13.74% | 3.01% | 1.11% | 0.41% | 4.98% | 6.49% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EIAMX vs. EAPCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIAMX drawdown since its inception was -43.35%, smaller than the maximum EAPCX drawdown of -52.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIAMX and EAPCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIAMX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.35% | -52.59% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.14% | -9.09% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.02% | -18.05% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -28.81% | -14.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.97% | -0.39% | -10.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -23.03% | +6.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.48% | 2.60% | -2.12% |
Volatility
EIAMX vs. EAPCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Eaton Vance Multi-Asset Credit Fund (EIAMX) is 0.73%, while Parametric Commodity Strategy Fund Class A (EAPCX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that EIAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EIAMX | EAPCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 4.58% | -3.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | 11.78% | -10.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74% | 14.85% | -12.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 14.64% | -11.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 13.29% | +9.19% |