EHY vs. TLTP
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and TLTP (Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while TLTP is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 20+ Year 12% Premium Covered Call 2.0 Index. EHY is actively managed, while TLTP is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TLTP.
Performance
EHY vs. TLTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -37.68% return, which is significantly lower than TLTP's -0.44% return.
EHY
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- 6M
- -42.96%
- YTD
- -37.68%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EHY vs. TLTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -37.68% | -25.56% |
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF | -0.44% | -0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and TLTP is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. TLTP — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TLTP
EHY vs. TLTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF (TLTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | TLTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.87 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. TLTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, which is greater than TLTP's maximum drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and TLTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | TLTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.70% | -8.54% | -53.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.70% | -3.81% | -49.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.61% | -3.22% | -33.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.28% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. TLTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | TLTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.61% | 7.31% | +53.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.61% | 9.69% | +50.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.61% | 9.69% | +50.92% |
EHY vs. TLTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTP's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHY vs. TLTP - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.54%, more than TLTP's 13.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 53.54% | 8.87% | 0.00% |
TLTP Amplify Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Target High Income ETF | 13.41% | 12.53% | 2.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and TLTP have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTP is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTP is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 53.54%, compared with 13.41% for TLTP.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while TLTP is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.38% for TLTP.
Find the right allocation for EHY and TLTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer