EHY vs. MLPB
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while MLPB is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. EHY is actively managed, while MLPB is passively managed. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MLPB.
Performance
EHY vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -36.53% return, which is significantly lower than MLPB's 24.64% return.
EHY
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 12.11%
- 6M
- -17.76%
- YTD
- -36.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MLPB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- YTD
- 24.64%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.68%
- 5Y*
- 22.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $63.17K | $39.74K | $73.16K | |
| $110.82K | $110.30K | $134.97K |
EHY vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -36.53% | -25.56% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 24.64% | 4.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and MLPB is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MLPB
EHY vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, smaller than the maximum MLPB drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and MLPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.70% | -71.93% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.84% | -1.63% | -51.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.86% | -14.65% | -23.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.35% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.54% | 14.10% | +45.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 19.58% | +39.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 27.20% | +32.34% |
EHY vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHY vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.23%, more than MLPB's 5.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 59.23% | 8.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.79% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and MLPB have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EHY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EHY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 59.23%, compared with 5.79% for MLPB.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MLPB is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.85% for MLPB.
Find the right allocation for EHY and MLPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer