EHY vs. IBLC

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EHY is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.

Performance

EHY vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -38.94% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 31.00% return.

EHY

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -27.96%
• YTD: -38.94%
• 6M: -37.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBLC

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 8.35%
• YTD: 31.00%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 64.83%
• 3Y*: 50.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHY vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	-38.94%	-25.71%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	31.00%	-33.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EHY and IBLC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

EHY vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBLC

IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 30
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHY vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EHY	IBLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.22	0.39	-1.61

Drawdowns

EHY vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -54.64%, smaller than the maximum IBLC drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and IBLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHY	IBLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.64%	-62.54%	+7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-44.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-51.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.64%	-13.87%	-40.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.26%	-25.88%	-7.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.58%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EHY	IBLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	40.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.19%	54.80%	+3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.19%	64.46%	-6.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.19%	64.46%	-6.27%

EHY vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

EHY vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.91%, more than IBLC's 4.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF	48.91%	8.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF	4.82%	6.31%	1.60%	1.79%	0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EHY and IBLC in my portfolio?

EHY and IBLC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EHY or IBLC?

On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EHY or IBLC?

IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EHY or IBLC?

EHY has the higher dividend yield at 48.91%, compared with 4.82% for IBLC.

What is the main difference between EHY and IBLC?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 0.47% for IBLC.