EHY vs. CNBS
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while CNBS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
EHY vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -36.53% return, which is significantly lower than CNBS's -15.30% return.
EHY
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- 12.11%
- 6M
- -17.76%
- YTD
- -36.53%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CNBS
- 1D
- -6.51%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- 6M
- -7.86%
- YTD
- -15.30%
- 1Y
- 11.76%
- 3Y*
- -9.40%
- 5Y*
- -33.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $158.84K | $101.95K | $276.64K | |
| $63.17K | $39.74K | $73.16K |
EHY vs. CNBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -36.53% | -25.56% |
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | -15.30% | -12.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and CNBS is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. CNBS — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CNBS
EHY vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | CNBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, smaller than the maximum CNBS drawdown of -95.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and CNBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | CNBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.70% | -95.71% | +34.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -51.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -73.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.84% | -92.62% | +39.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.86% | -71.72% | +33.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.80% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. CNBS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | CNBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.54% | 104.59% | -45.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 65.25% | -5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.54% | 61.13% | -1.59% |
EHY vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EHY and CNBS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
EHY vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.23%, while CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 59.23% | 8.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and CNBS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EHY and CNBS have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 59.23%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CNBS is Cannabis.
Find the right allocation for EHY and CNBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer