EHY vs. CNBS
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while CNBS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
EHY vs. CNBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -48.45% return, which is significantly lower than CNBS's -4.24% return.
EHY
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -29.59%
- YTD
- -48.45%
- 6M
- -47.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNBS
- 1D
- 4.39%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- -4.24%
- 6M
- -5.64%
- 1Y
- 82.94%
- 3Y*
- -3.50%
- 5Y*
- -33.59%
- 10Y*
- —
EHY vs. CNBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -48.45% | -25.56% |
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | -4.24% | -12.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and CNBS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. CNBS — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CNBS
EHY vs. CNBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | CNBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.91 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. CNBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -61.70%, smaller than the maximum CNBS drawdown of -95.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and CNBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | CNBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.70% | -95.71% | +34.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -51.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -73.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -93.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.70% | -91.66% | +29.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.02% | -71.40% | +36.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.58% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. CNBS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | CNBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.74% | 106.01% | -45.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.74% | 65.06% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.74% | 61.34% | -0.60% |
EHY vs. CNBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EHY and CNBS have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
EHY vs. CNBS - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.94%, while CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.58% |
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 57.94% | 8.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and CNBS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EHY and CNBS have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 57.94%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CNBS is Cannabis.
Find the right allocation for EHY and CNBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer