EHY vs. BWET
EHY (Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EHY is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Amplify, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. EHY is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EHY charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.
Performance
EHY vs. BWET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -47.40% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 769.73% return.
EHY
- 1D
- -5.18%
- 1M
- -27.85%
- YTD
- -47.40%
- 6M
- -46.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BWET
- 1D
- -18.59%
- 1M
- -3.58%
- YTD
- 769.73%
- 6M
- 723.00%
- 1Y
- 1,296.25%
- 3Y*
- 109.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EHY vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | -47.40% | -25.56% |
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 769.73% | 34.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHY and BWET is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHY vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank
EHY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BWET
EHY vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EHY | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 42.79 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 136.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EHY vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and BWET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHY | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.92% | -56.90% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.92% | -23.05% | -37.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -23.76% | -11.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.87% | — |
Volatility
EHY vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHY | BWET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 32.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 91.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.88% | 100.33% | -39.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.88% | 71.24% | -10.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.88% | 71.24% | -10.36% |
EHY vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EHY vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison
EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.77%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EHY Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF | 56.77% | 8.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHY and BWET have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EHY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EHY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.
EHY has the higher dividend yield at 56.77%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.
EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BWET is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 3.50% for BWET.
Find the right allocation for EHY and BWET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer