PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EHY vs. BWET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EHY vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHY achieves a -47.40% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 769.73% return.


EHY

1D
-5.18%
1M
-27.85%
YTD
-47.40%
6M
-46.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BWET

1D
-18.59%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
769.73%
6M
723.00%
1Y
1,296.25%
3Y*
109.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHY vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EHY and BWET is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EHY vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BWET
BWET Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHY vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Ethereum Max Income Covered Call ETF (EHY) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EHYBWETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.83

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

42.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

136.82

EHY vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EHY vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHY drawdown since its inception was -60.92%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHY and BWET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EHYBWETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.92%

-56.90%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.92%

-23.05%

-37.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-23.76%

-11.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.87%

Volatility

EHY vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EHYBWETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

91.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.88%

100.33%

-39.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.88%

71.24%

-10.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.88%

71.24%

-10.36%

EHY vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EHY vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

EHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.77%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


EHY and BWET have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EHY is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EHY is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

EHY has the higher dividend yield at 56.77%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

EHY is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BWET is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for EHY and 3.50% for BWET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHY and BWET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer