EHLS vs. LBAY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY).

EHLS and LBAY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EHLS is an actively managed fund by N/A. It was launched on Apr 1, 2024. LBAY is an actively managed fund by Toroso Investments. It was launched on Nov 16, 2020.

Performance

EHLS vs. LBAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EHLS vs. LBAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF	7.41%	6.67%	11.57%
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF	15.70%	4.08%	-8.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHLS achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly lower than LBAY's 15.70% return.

EHLS

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: 7.41%
• 6M: 7.65%
• 1Y: 24.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LBAY

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -2.46%
• YTD: 15.70%
• 6M: 13.71%
• 1Y: 12.46%
• 3Y*: 4.32%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EHLS vs. LBAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHLS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than LBAY's 1.09% expense ratio.

EHLS

Even Herd Long Short ETF

LBAY

Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF

Return for Risk

EHLS vs. LBAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EHLS

EHLS Risk / Return Rank: 70
EHLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
EHLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EHLS Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EHLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
EHLS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

LBAY

LBAY Risk / Return Rank: 38
LBAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
LBAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LBAY Omega Ratio Rank: 35
LBAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LBAY Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EHLS vs. LBAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EHLS	LBAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	0.77	+0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	1.23	+0.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.15	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	1.23	+1.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.21	2.98	+5.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EHLS vs. LBAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHLS Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the LBAY Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHLS and LBAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EHLS	LBAY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	0.77	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.66	0.73	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between EHLS and LBAY is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

EHLS vs. LBAY - Dividend Comparison

EHLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LBAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EHLS Even Herd Long Short ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LBAY Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF	3.41%	3.80%	3.77%	3.47%	2.74%	2.96%	0.29%

Drawdowns

EHLS vs. LBAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHLS drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than LBAY's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHLS and LBAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	EHLS	LBAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.96%	-15.99%	-2.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.06%	-9.71%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.53%	-2.89%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.71%	-6.77%	+2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	4.01%	-0.91%

Volatility

EHLS vs. LBAY - Volatility Comparison

Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Leatherback Long/Short Alternative Yield ETF (LBAY) at 5.17%. This indicates that EHLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LBAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EHLS	LBAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	5.17%	+2.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.81%	12.15%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.22%	16.17%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.00%	13.48%	+6.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.00%	13.66%	+6.34%