PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EHLS vs. HFND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EHLS vs. HFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EHLS achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than HFND's 7.36% return.


EHLS

1D
0.55%
1M
-2.28%
6M
2.88%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
16.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.66%

HFND

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.78%
6M
3.29%
YTD
7.36%
1Y
14.50%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.47K$14.20K$68.98K
$479.64K$339.51K$276.08K

EHLS vs. HFND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
10.15%6.67%12.31%
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
7.36%8.93%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EHLS and HFND is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.54

The correlation between EHLS and HFND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EHLS vs. HFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EHLS
EHLS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EHLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EHLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HFND
HFND Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFND Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFND Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EHLS vs. HFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) and Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EHLSHFNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

2.76

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.40

9.47

-5.07

EHLS vs. HFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EHLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the HFND Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EHLS and HFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EHLS vs. HFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EHLS drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, which is greater than HFND's maximum drawdown of -13.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHLS and HFND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EHLSHFNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.96%

-13.31%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-4.94%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.17%

-2.02%

-4.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-2.06%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

1.44%

+2.10%

Volatility

EHLS vs. HFND - Volatility Comparison

Even Herd Long Short ETF (EHLS) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF (HFND) at 2.51%. This indicates that EHLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EHLSHFNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

2.51%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.84%

7.86%

+6.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.19%

10.04%

+9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

9.49%

+10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.56%

9.49%

+10.07%

EHLS vs. HFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

EHLS has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than HFND's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

EHLS vs. HFND - Dividend Comparison

EHLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EHLS
Even Herd Long Short ETF
0.00%0.00%1.03%0.00%0.00%
HFND
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF
4.73%5.08%3.70%1.41%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


EHLS and HFND have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EHLS has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to HFND (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHLS dropped -18.96% vs HFND's -13.31%.

On 1-year performance, EHLS leads with 16.88% vs 14.50% for HFND. On fees, HFND is cheaper at 1.22% per year. On volatility, HFND has been the lower-risk option at 2.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EHLS has performed better with a 16.88% return vs 14.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFND is cheaper with a 1.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for EHLS.

HFND has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 0.00% for EHLS.

EHLS is categorized as Long-Short, while HFND is Multistrategy. Their fees differ too: 1.58% for EHLS and 1.22% for HFND.

HFND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EHLS and HFND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer