EHI vs. FINS
EHI (Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc) and FINS (Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, EHI returned 0.46%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for FINS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EHI charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FINS.
Performance
EHI vs. FINS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EHI achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than FINS's 1.52% return.
EHI
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -1.80%
- 6M
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- 8.38%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
FINS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 11.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- —
EHI vs. FINS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHI Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc | -1.80% | 9.15% | 5.63% | 19.22% | -25.22% | 9.37% | 8.81% | 8.31% |
FINS Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust | 1.52% | 15.17% | 18.33% | 2.55% | -18.18% | 9.08% | -12.57% | 7.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between EHI and FINS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2019 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EHI vs. FINS — Risk / Return Rank
EHI
FINS
EHI vs. FINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc (EHI) and Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (FINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EHI | FINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.26 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.05 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 7.51 | -5.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EHI | FINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.40 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.22 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.12 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
EHI vs. FINS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EHI drawdown since its inception was -58.50%, which is greater than FINS's maximum drawdown of -40.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EHI and FINS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EHI | FINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.50% | -40.79% | -17.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.14% | -5.64% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | -6.04% | -12.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.81% | -26.44% | -7.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -0.70% | -4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -13.13% | +4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 1.54% | +1.26% |
Volatility
EHI vs. FINS - Volatility Comparison
Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc (EHI) and Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (FINS) have volatilities of 2.44% and 2.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EHI | FINS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.44% | 2.38% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.30% | 6.28% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.77% | 8.27% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.93% | 10.91% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 20.93% | -6.52% |
EHI vs. FINS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EHI has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FINS's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EHI vs. FINS - Dividend Comparison
EHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.12%, more than FINS's 10.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EHI Western Asset Global High Income Fund Inc | 14.12% | 13.10% | 12.37% | 11.12% | 11.82% | 7.95% | 8.02% | 7.52% | 8.91% | 8.32% | 11.58% | 13.25% |
FINS Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust | 10.66% | 10.13% | 10.30% | 10.04% | 9.74% | 7.63% | 7.42% | 3.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EHI and FINS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EHI has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to FINS (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EHI dropped -58.50% vs FINS's -40.79%.
FINS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EHI and FINS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer