PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FINS vs. FOCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FINS vs. FOCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (FINS) and Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FINS achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than FOCIX's 9.48% return.


FINS

1D
-0.08%
1M
-1.53%
6M
-0.38%
YTD
0.79%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
13.19%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.34%

FOCIX

1D
-1.19%
1M
1.09%
6M
7.04%
YTD
9.48%
1Y
12.35%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
7.03%
ALL TIME*
7.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$499.23K$530.98K$501.18K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FINS vs. FOCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FINS
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust
0.79%15.17%18.33%2.55%-18.18%9.08%-12.57%7.39%
FOCIX
Fairholme Focused Income Fund
9.48%6.17%14.67%12.58%6.00%6.73%0.99%-1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FINS and FOCIX is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2019

0.17

The correlation between FINS and FOCIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FINS vs. FOCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FINS
FINS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FINS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FINS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCIX
FOCIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FOCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FINS vs. FOCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (FINS) and Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FINSFOCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.27

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

3.51

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.04

9.80

-5.76

FINS vs. FOCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FINS Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the FOCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FINS and FOCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FINS vs. FOCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FINS drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, which is greater than FOCIX's maximum drawdown of -18.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FINS and FOCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FINSFOCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.79%

-18.78%

-22.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-3.33%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

-7.96%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.44%

-12.36%

-14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-1.19%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-4.73%

-8.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

1.19%

+0.45%

Volatility

FINS vs. FOCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust (FINS) is 1.93%, while Fairholme Focused Income Fund (FOCIX) has a volatility of 3.17%. This indicates that FINS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FINSFOCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

3.17%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

6.37%

-0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.23%

7.91%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.89%

9.60%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

9.13%

+11.58%

FINS vs. FOCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FINS has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCIX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FINS vs. FOCIX - Dividend Comparison

FINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.03%, more than FOCIX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FINS
Angel Oak Financial Strategies Income Term Trust
11.03%10.13%10.30%10.04%9.74%7.63%7.42%3.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FOCIX
Fairholme Focused Income Fund
1.15%1.31%2.46%2.82%2.24%1.12%0.65%2.75%4.57%9.83%5.16%5.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


FINS and FOCIX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOCIX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to FINS (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FINS dropped -40.79% vs FOCIX's -18.78%.

FOCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FINS and FOCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer